Tuesday, June 02, 2009

strange game is the US Justice Dept also in New Brunswick.

What kind of strange game is the US Justice Dept and the SEC playing
with me now Mr Litt? Rest assured I won't play it and many people know
that I never would Even though the corporate media won't talk about my
concerns about your actions, others certainly do.

Here is just one example that still exists on the net. Even though
Danny Boy Fitzgerald hates this mean old Maritimer, at least
understands the meaning of the term Integrity and detests you people
more. I am merely wondering how much longer his blog will exist. You
know why EH T.J. Burke?

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/search?q=amos

You dudes know as well as I that my concerns are far greater that mere
matters of money and Bernie Madoff. Perhaps you should talk to your
associates in the RCMP and the INTERPOL ASAP Clearly I am trying hard
to make the whole world know about my concerns about the Feds' severe
lack of integrity EH H. David Kotz?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY

Ms Olsen

Thank you for keeping me informed.

Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
of Law within a purported democracy.

As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.

The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
beginning over seven years ago..

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
506 756 8687

P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
night.

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull

Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.

"SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."

He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
Putnam insiders.

Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
is in hot water again.

Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
enter the private sector," Scannell said."

--- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos wrote:


INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
To: David Amos

I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.

Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.

He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us

I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.

Thank you,

Chief Dave Peck

From: USANYS-MADOFF
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY

In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
victims that has been submitted in connection with the case. This
includes your email to the Government. If the correspondence from
victims is unsealed, the victim's personal identifying information
including name, address, telephone number and email address (to the
extent it was included on the correspondence) will become public. The
Government must submit a response to the request by NBC and ABC by
Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know whether you consent to
the full disclosure of your correspondence, or whether you wish to
have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy or other reasons.
If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
can. Thank you.

I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
chickenshits.

I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos




From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
To: PChavkin@mintz.com
Cc: webo
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:

Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.

Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by the
Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense counsel
to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce its
intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite individuals
who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.

The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
proceeding.

A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
be
found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York:

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys


-----Original Message-----
From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM

Dear Mr. Amos,

I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.

We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.

Sincerely,

Thomas J. Sartory

No comments: