Friday, June 27, 2008

uranium mining companies? WATER

Canada panel urges lifting foreign investment rules
Published Friday June 27th, 2008
Report Business groups laud the recommendations
Canwest News Service
http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/search/article/338530

Canada should ease foreign investment restrictions on telecommunications,
air transport and uranium mining companies to enhance competition, a
government-appointed expert panel said Thursday.

Uranium sector cheers panel's call for liberalization
Published Friday June 27th, 2008
Peter Koven
Canwest News Service
http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/search/article/338553

TORONTO - The two dominant players in Canada's uranium sector are cheering
the Competition Policy Review Panel's call for liberalization of the
industry - a call that comes with an enormous condition.

The global uranium industry holds strict limits on foreign investment that
date back to Cold War-era concerns over nuclear weapons proliferation. In
Canada, foreign ownership of uranium mining is capped at 49 per cent unless
a Canadian partner for a project cannot be found. Other countries have
similar or more restrictive rules.

The panel suggests that Canada liberalize these rules to allow more foreign
investment, but only if other countries take similar measures to allow
Canadian firms to invest abroad or get access to key technologies.

That is exactly what Jerry Grandey, chief executive of Cameco Corp., wanted
to hear. Cameco used the word "reciprocity" in its submission to the panel,
and that became a core part of the final report.

"I think the panel has come to a very sound conclusion that Canada should
not unilaterally change its current policy without demanding benefits
flowing in the other direction," he said in an interview.

More than three-quarters of global production is centred in just seven
countries, including Canada.

Grandey said there are countries "on virtually every continent" that
Saskatoon-based Cameco, the world's biggest uranium miner, would like to
invest in but cannot because of ownership restrictions. He also believes
that reaching liberalized investment agreements with other countries is
very achievable, because almost every deal in the nuclear industry is
already done through negotiated bilateral agreements. "The mechanisms are
already there for Canada to sit down with other countries and negotiate,"
he said.

The other big player in the Canadian uranium sector is the French firm
Areva Group. Despite some questions about what "reciprocity" would mean,
Areva Canada president Armand Laferrere welcomed the panel's findings as
much as Cameco.

"It looks like it would make it easier for us to do what we want to do,
which is to invest more in Canada," he said.

The panel broached another topic that could change the landscape of
Canada's nuclear sector: enrichment. Because of nuclear weapon concerns,
there are only six countries in the world that are allowed to enrich
uranium, and Canada is not one of them.

The panel suggested that Canada could open up its domestic market in
exchange for securing access to enrichment technologies that would allow it
to move up the value chain in the industry.

"I think that as a producing nation, we should be in a position where we
could participate in all segments of the fuel cycle. And (enrichment) would
be an increasingly important one as we go to the next generations of
reactors," said Murray Elston, president of the Canadian Nuclear Association.





Water Fuel C
4.60136986301
730 ratings
Sign in to rate
Views: 2,445,476
Share Share Favorite Favorite Add to Playlists Playlists
This video will appear on your blog shortly.
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Thank you for sharing this video!
Saving...
This video has been added to your favorites.

This video has been removed from your favorites.

Loading...
The video has been added to your playlist.






Commentary
Statistics & Data
Video Responses: 0 Text Comments: 1,434
Video Responses (0)



This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.


Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (1,434)
Show: Help Change this to see only comments above a certain value.
Change the value of a comment by clicking on a thumb.
when you burn hydrogen, it simply turns back to water/h2o, there is no loss in water.
thats like when they tell you not to take long showers, because it saves water, BULLSHIT..take a shower for 10 days, its just gonna go back into the earth, and evaporate, than come down as rain again...
SkylineMixtapesCom (3 hours ago) Show Hide
there is going to be hyrogen gas stations, instead of cars that convert water to hydrogen for you..........SO THE MAJOR CORPS ARE STILL GOING TO CHARGE YOU FOR GAS !!
i dont like it as much as the next guy, but its whats going to happen, look it up on here yourself if you dont believe me...........
SkylineMixtapesCom (3 hours ago) Show Hide
wtf are you talking about, did you not read what i said.
we will be using this in the near future, hydrogen/water cars already exist, every major auto co has one, MY POINT IS, IF YOU KNOW HOW TO READ, car companies will sell you a car that already runs on hydrogen INSTEAD of water, so that you have to STILL go to the gas station and pay for it...if you still cant understand what im saying, no one can help you.
bizzle246 (4 hours ago) Show Hide
so? gas is $4 a gallon. i rather use this than pay $75 to go the gas station.
SkylineMixtapesCom (6 hours ago) Show Hide
just because your local car dealer isnt advertising a water car for sale, does not mean it does not exist.
all major auto corps will relase the hydrogen car the same year, and they will also try and sell you hydrogen from a gas station, instead of letting you put water in the car and converting it yourself, watch
SkylineMixtapesCom (6 hours ago) Show Hide
because, why would they want you to heat your house on water, and run your car on water ?
next you might start to grow your own food, and actually not NEED the government......think about it...2 million ppl seen this video and havent clued in, most ppl are just stupid, thats mostly why
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
MRSBA7 (15 hours ago) Show Hide
2008. nothing still


why not save the plant with water ????







An increasing number of cottage owners across Canada are mulling the sale of their summer properties to reduce the strain on their wallets brought on by soaring gas prices, reports a

leading real estate firm




Water Fuel Car
Rate:
4.60136986301
730 ratings
Sign in to rate
Views: 2,445,476

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Discovery Portal

FRANÇAIS | ENGLISH

Home - Canadian e-Discovery Portal

Welcome to the Canadian e-Discovery Portal. Here you will find all the relevant documents and resources pertaining to e-discovery in Canada, including regularly updated case law digests.

News

2008-03-25 - The e-Discovery Reading List on the practicePRO website was updated.

2008-03-25 - The Canadian E-Discovery Case Law Digests (Common law) was updated.

2008-03-19 - IT.Can announces that the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia and the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal recently released tentative versions of the new Nova Scotia Civil Procedure Rules.

The Sedona Canada Principles

Handout Version

Other formats: PDF, DOC

Addressing Electronic Discovery

  • Principle 1: Electronically stored information is discoverable.
  • Principle 2: In any proceeding, the parties should ensure that steps taken in the discovery process are proportionate, taking into account (i) the nature and scope of the litigation, including the importance and complexity of the issues, interest and amounts at stake; (ii) the relevance of the available electronically stored information; (iii) its importance to the court's adjudication in a given case; and (iv) the costs, burden and delay that may be imposed on the parties to deal with electronically stored information.
  • Principle 3: As soon as litigation is reasonably anticipated, parties must consider their obligation to take reasonable and good faith steps to preserve potentially relevant electronically stored information.
  • Principle 4: Counsel and parties should meet and confer as soon as practicable, and on an ongoing basis, regarding the identification, preservation, collection, review and production of electronically stored information.
  • Principle 5: The parties should be prepared to produce relevant electronically stored information that is reasonably accessible in terms of cost and burden.
  • Principle 6: A party should not be required, absent agreement or a court order based on demonstrated need and relevance, to search for or collect deleted or residual electronically stored information.
  • Principle 7: A party may satisfy its obligation to preserve, coll ect, review and produce electronically stored information in good faith by using electronic tools and processes such as data sampling, searching or by using selection criteria to collect potentially relevant electronically stored information.
  • Principle 8: Parties should agree as early as possible in the litigation process on the format in which electronically stored information will be produced. Parties should also agree on the format, content and organization of information to be exchanged in any required list of documents as part of the discovery process.
  • Principle 9: During the discovery process parties should agree to or, if necessary, seek judicial direction on measures to protect privileges, privacy, trade secrets and other confidential information relating to the production of electronic documents and data.
  • Principle 10: During the discovery process, parties should anticipate and respect the rules of the forum in which the litigation takes place, while appreciating the impact any decisions may have in related actions in other forums.
  • Principle 11: Sanctions should be considered by the court where a party will be materially prejudiced by another party's failure to meet any obligation to preserve, collect, review or produce electronically stored information. The party in default may avoid sanctions if it demonstrates the failure was not intentional or reckless.
  • Principle 12: The reasonable costs of preserving, collecting and reviewing electronically stored information will generally be borne by the party producing it. In limited circumstances, it may be appropriate for the parties to arrive at a different allocation of costs on an interim basis, by either agreement or court order.

Copyright © 2008, The Sedona Conference®. Reprinted courtesy of The Sedona Conference®. You can download a free copy of the complete document for your personal use.

Content Managers

  • Peg Duncan, Department of Justice, Ottawa, Ontario
  • Dominic Jaar, Bell Canada, Montreal, Quebec
  • Dan Pinnington, LAWPRO, Toronto, Ontario
  • Frédéric Pelletier, LexUM, Montreal, Quebec

Law Society Shirley MacLean knew what was comming down


Head Person at Law Society knew what was going on in 1998 with Doug Young building the New Fredericton to Moncton highway and the N.S. Lawyers doing %90 of the legal work ?





RE: ‏
From: Shirley MacLean (smaclean@LawSociety-Barreau.nb.ca)
Sent: November 17, 2006 1:29:15 PM
To: Richard Harris (injusticecoalition@hotmail.com)
Sir
Please note that we do not process matters vis electronic mail. Please forward any matters vis regular mail or fax (451-1421). This e-mail will be deleted. Thank you.
S. MacLean
Registrar
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Harris [mailto:injusticecoalition@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:20 PM
To: Shirley MacLean
Subject:

Sure make a person think what was said behind the scene??/

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Fredericton City Police Officer

I will have some pretty serious questions about the actions of Cpl
Stephen Horsman
and his stated prowess with a computer etc. Lets just say I have been
investigating him for awhile.

For the record I knew who was behind the following web site Stevey Boy
Horsman was investigating the instant they allowed their blogger buddy
Chucky Leblanc to slander me as a Hells Angel and tease me about being
illegaly banished from the Leg under malicious threat of arrest by the
Fat Fred City Finests . FYI they don't own it it is based in the USA
One of the Fake Left in Fat Fred City assiting Chucky Leblanc and the
Fat Fred City finest against was a dipshit political opponet running
under the Green Banner of the Fake Left in Fat Fred City in 2004. Thus
it begs the obvious question did the Fat Fred City Finest make a
digital deal of sorts with the Fake left in Fat Fred City in 2002? I
see that your cops don't mind Chucky Leblanc Following you around. If
I tried that just to ask you to go find my old Harley your cops would
arrest me in seconds for harassing a chickenshit. Correct?

http://www.electionprediction.org/2004_fed/riding/13003-fredericton.htm

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:5jEgxQ94GpMJ:www.dominionpaper.ca/pdf/dominion-issue9.pdf+%22Daron+Letts%22+indymedia&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2

http://www.cpcml.ca/Tmld2003/D33031.htm

http://halifaxsymposium.ca/advocacy_journalism/000312.html

http://archives.lists.indymedia.org/imc-maritimes/2003-October/000810.html

http://archives.lists.indymedia.org/imc-maritimes/2002-September/000660.html

[Imc-maritimes] Please contact myself
Horsman, Stephen imc-maritimes at lists.indymedia.org
Thu Sep 26 22:40:13 2002

Hello, my name is Stephen Horsman, I am a police officer of the Fredericton
City Police Fredericton NB. I am requesting somebody from this organization
contact me at 506-460-2427. I can eventually find out who owns the sight
and contact them that way but prefer to speak to somebody on their terms.
Thanks for your consideration. Nobody is in any trouble. Thanks again hope
to hear from you.

Stephen

First Nations will fight uranium mining

First Nations will fight uranium mining

Meanwhile, the wealth of generations is being pumped out, dug up, paved
over and redesigned without so much as a thank you to the peoples who first
occupied these territories.

Of particular concern to the Mi'kmaq and Maliseet peoples is the new
scourge of uranium mining.

If uranium mining takes place it will take place in our backyards, near our
farms and villages, close to our rivers.

The First Nations will not allow their natural heritage to be poisoned by
this ill-conceived effort.

Does anyone believe that the First Nations would meekly stand by and allow
others to destroy our bond with the land when we, ourselves, are prohibited
from doing so by the very nature of our ancient title? Uranium mining is
clearly the Mi'kmaq and Maliseet "line in the sand."

We will do whatever else is necessary to prevent this harmful exploitation.




If you live downwind from proposed uranium mines, you might want to pay a
little attention to what's happened to Navajos in the United States living
on a 26,000 square mile reservation that spans the Four Corners region
where Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado meet.

For three generations now, they have been breathing uranium-laden dust from
mine tailings and drinking from wells tainted with minute traces of
radioactive mining waste. From 1946 into the late 1970s, more than 40
million tons of uranium ore was mined near Navajo communities.

More than a thousand mines were abandoned on the reservation. For every
four pounds of uranium extracted, 996 pounds of radioactive refuse was left
behind in waste pits and piles swept by the wind and leached into local
drinking water.

In addition to the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Navajo miners who
sickened and died of cancer and respiratory illnesses -- it's hard to say
just how many, since nobody in power bothered to keep track --
epidemiological studies reveal a terrible ongoing toll. Navajo children
living near the mines and mills suffered five times the rate of bone cancer
and 15 times the rate of testicular and ovarian cancers as other Americans.
Exposure to uranium has also been linked to kidney damage and birth defects.

Recent research indicates that, in addition to being toxic and radioactive,
uranium is also an endocrine disruptor and can have a devastating effect on
health -- even when only scant traces are present in the air we breathe or
the water we drink.

Approve of uranium mining at the certain risk of your health and those of
others.


Grand Digue

The Expropriation is a health risk for sure ? when they take your work a way

make you fight for your Right? then after 12 years you find out you have no right ?

Stay tuned.

Monday, June 23, 2008

Leadership Responsibility ?

GREGORY S. KEALEY BECOMES FIRST PROVOST AT UNB
 (click to enlarge)

June 12, 2008
UNB News Release: E357
Dan Tanaka, Communications Manager (506) 648-5697

Gregory S. Kealey will become the University of New Brunswick’s first provost, with responsibility for overall academic leadership during what is expected to be a chapter of accelerated change for UNB in the next few years.

Dr. Kealey will assume his duties as provost beginning July 1, 2008, for a term ending on Dec. 31, 2011. He will also continue in his current position as UNB’s vice-president (research) during this time.

“Greg Kealey has a clear understanding of how strong partnerships can advance both UNB and New Brunswick, as demonstrated by his leadership on the research front,” said John McLaughlin, UNB president. “I have every confidence he will continue to build strong relationships across UNB, nationally and internationally.”

A number of factors were considered by UNB’s Board of Governors in their decision to attach a provost mandate to the responsibilities of the vice-president (research).

The provincial government’s response to the recommendations of the Premier’s Working Group on Post-Secondary Education in New Brunswick will set the tone for higher education in the province, and UNB will continue to play a central role in this agenda.

UNB’s recently established Commission on Inter-Campus Relations is also poised to make recommendations that will provide guidance for the university’s governance and administrative structures. The provost will fill an immediate need for overall academic leadership during this bridging period, working closely with the vice-president (academic) Fredericton, the vice-president (Saint John) and other senior members of the university’s management team.

“I am happy to accept this position at this critically important time for our university,” said Dr. Kealey. “UNB’s participation in areas of public policy and our impact on the social and economic landscape of New Brunswick have been significant. We want to continue to build on this foundation through improved governance and a renewed academic focus.”

Dr. Kealey has significant experience at UNB and at other Canadian universities, and has demonstrated effective academic leadership in the areas of research and graduate studies. Having lived in Atlantic Canada for more than half his life, he has a strong sense of the region’s rich history and a commitment to the role of Atlantic universities in promoting economic and social development.

Since his arrival at UNB in December 2001, from Memorial University in Newfoundland and Labrador, Dr. Kealey has promoted and encouraged research initiatives and connected researchers to larger national and international communities. He has also successfully doubled research funding for UNB from government agencies, programs and industry. He holds a BA in modern history from the University of Toronto, and master’s and doctoral degrees from the University of Rochester.

In March 2005 he was appointed to the governing body of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), where he is currently a member of the Executive Committee and chair of the Standing Committee on Research Support. He is also a member of the Industry Canada University Advisory Committee and of the National Research Council’s Institute of Information Technology Advisory Board. He has served as president of the Canadian Historical Association, president of the Social Science Federation of Canada and acting co-president of the Humanities and Social Science Federation of Canada.

In his role as vice-president (research) at UNB, Dr. Kealey chairs the Board of Enterprise UNB, the university’s technology transfer facility. He also chairs advisory boards of the Canadian Research Institute for Social Policy, the Canadian Rivers Institute, and the Institute of Biomedical Engineering and serves on the board of the Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research. Outside UNB, he is president of Knowledge Park Inc., a Fredericton Science Park, and serves on the boards of BioAtlantech, King’s Landing, Potato Research Cluster and the Research Productivity Council.

Established in 1785, UNB is one of the oldest public universities in North America. One of the top five comprehensive universities in Canada, according to Maclean’s, UNB has more than 12,000 students from more than 100 countries. As the largest research institution in New Brunswick, UNB conducts 80 per cent of the province’s research. The university has more than 3,500 faculty and staff, and an annual operating budget of more than $160 million. UNB’s two main campuses are located in Fredericton and Saint John, New Brunswick.

- 30 -



© The University of New Brunswick
webmanager@unb.ca

Thursday, June 19, 2008

MySpace has incorporated

> To: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: FW: [gov-Injustice] fredericton Appraisal Associates Ltd

[ref:00D78NrS.500767JBw:ref]
>
> Hello,
>
> Below is a pretty comprehensive overview on blogs presented in an FAQ format.

It should answer all the questions you have about blogs.
>
>
>
> Q: What is a blog?
>
>
>
> A: A 'blog' is an online journal. Blog is short for Weblog. In recent years,

'blogging' or posting an online journal has become very popular.

MySpace has incorporated a feature to allow users to post their thoughts, dreams,

random internet findings, or anything their heart desires.

The blog feature on Myspace is as expansive or as simple as you make it.

For those just looking to post quick thoughts and postings, the blog feature is easy to get started.

For advanced users, the blog feature is fully customizable.
>
>
>
> Q: How do I get started with my own Blog?
>
>
>
> A: All users on MySpace are allowed to post blogs.

Once you have signed in, click on 'blog' tab in the main menu bar to view the blog section.

Here, you can view blogs from people you have subscribed to, view those who have subscribed

to your blog, edit your preferred list, post new blogs, and customize your blog.
>
>
>
> Posting a Blog: To post a blog, click on the "post new blog" link under "my controls".

You will be brought to a page where you can post a blog.

A fter picking a title, type whatever you want in the "body".

You can also adjust the date and time the blog was posted, the category of the posting,

what you are doing while you are blogging, your current mood, and adjust the privacy.

By default, all blogs will be viewable to anyone who visits your page. However,

if you only want friends or preferred friends to view the blog, or you want to keep

the posting private as a normal diary, these options are available. There is no limit to

the number of blogs you can post. Note: clicking the 'diary' option allows others to view

the subject of your blog on your main portfolio, but not the body.
>
>
>
> Customizing your blog: The entire 'blog' section is fully customizable, just like the rest of MySpace.

Users can pick color schemes, layouts, and other features about the Blog section.

To customize your blog, click on the 'blog' link from the tool bar once you have logged in.

Click on 'customize blog' under the 'my controls' menu on the left side of the page.

All of the customization options are HTML-based, so a basic understanding of HTML is needed.

If you are not familiar with HTML, there are several tutorials available both on the internet

and in local bookstores with information on HTML coding. Hint: once you know HTML code,

you can customize your main MySpace page as well with colors, graphics, sound, video,

and other features.
>
>
>
> Subscribing to blogs: If you find that you are constantly reading the blog postings of a

certain user or users, you can 'subscribe' to their blogs.

Subscribing will notify you when they post a new entry.

To subscribe, you can either click on the 'subscribe to this blog' link on the person's main profile page,

or when viewing their blog click on the 'subscribe' link at the top of the page.

Your subscriptions can be edited from the 'my subscriptions' link under the blog tab.

A list of people who have subscribed to your blog is available under the 'my readers' tab from the blog homepage.
>
>
>
> Blog preferred list: The preferred list allows you to be selective in who you wish to have read your blogs.

The preferred list starts out empty, and you can add people to the list by clicking on the "find user to add"

link under "my preferred list". You will need to search for the user either by their Name, Display Name, or email address.

Once you have entered the users information, one of the options under the search results is "add to blog preferred list".

The user will not be notified of any changes you make to your preferred list.
>
>
>
> Q: Can I see who reads my blogs?
>
>
>
> A: Unfortunately, this feature is not currently available. You will see a count of how many people have viewed your blog,

but you aren't able to see exactly who is reading your blog (unless someone has subscribed to it).

If you are concerned about who reads your blogs, you may want to consider making your blog posts for friends only,

or possibly starting a preferred list.
>
>
>
> Q: I can only see 10 blogs. Where are the rest of them?
>
>
>
> A: On the left side of the blog page, there are 2 links: one says older, the other says newer.

Myspace will only display 10 blog posts at a time, but you can navigate to other postings with these links.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kudos and Comments: Users who read the blogs you have posted can give you 'kudos' as well as leave comments.

To give kudos, comments, or both, click on the 'add comment' button when reading the blog to which you want to respond.

Type in your message, click on the number of kudos to give (0, 1, or 2), and click 'post'.

If you just wish to add kudos, you can do that by leaving the message blank.
>
>
>
>
>
> If this does not address your issue completely, please press "Reply" and provide

any additional information you feel is relevant. Please do not alter the subject as it will

be considered a new inquiry. For the most up to date messages about MySpace,

subscribe to the MySpace Help blog! You get updates almost every day!

Go here to subscribe. www.myspace.com/myspacehelp
>
> Thank you for contacting MySpace.com.
>
>
> SURVEY FEEDBACK
> Tell us how we’re doing. Copy and paste this link to into a new browser to let us know what you think: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=YxDs83bYD086HJq4k_2fqHnw_3d_3d Please note,

MySpace will NEVER ask you for your password as part of our survey feedback.

We appreciate you taking the time to share your opinion with us.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> last day in Court http://www.archive.org/details/JudgeRussellCourtMarch2005lastDay16
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:00:16 -0700
> From: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
> To: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
> Subject: [gov-Injustice] fredericton Appraisal Associates Ltd.
>
> [http://www.archive.org/details/JudgeRussellCourtMarch2005lastDay16]
> link on title and stay tune ? Malcolm J. Carter ,AACI, FRI,CMR. WAS PAID OVER $10,000.00
> FOR HIS REPORTS ? FRAUD BY D.O.T. JOHN S.RAYMOND.???
>
> lesson to the last day in Court March 16/2005 Loss my work in 1997? February 12.1997.
>
>
>
>
> Hearing of Harris Expropriation case
>
> This item is part of the collection: Open Source Audio
>
> Author: Richard A.Harris
> Keywords: court audio files march 16 ; 2005
>
>
> WHY IS CARTER TURN A REPORT IN JANRUARY 23/1998.

Government did like it?
> and

also knew i change lawyers ?

so they got Carter to do #3 more reports up?
>

Why Carter did the Reports and did this ? the Direct Comparison Method.


In Oct /1994 when i had a store running and was completely discourage on how

thing was going ?

I decided i would put it on the Real estate Market a with the rest of my property.

store and lot 92-3 turn key - $230,000.00

Lot 92-2 for at the least i would take $15,900.00

lot 92-1 these are 2 corner lots by the way $15,900.00

and the H.A.R. subdivision property plan no: 200,302 25+acres for not less then $33,000.00

now if you add all up, $ 294,800.00 dollars worth of money to me?

I like you to look at the Russell Decision on http://canlii.org and see Russell baby paid me $2,760.oo for the H.A.R. property ? stay tune for more about the Fraud?

> Judge David Russell heard this in Court?
>
> He know about the Fraud?
>

>
> --
> Posted By Richard
A. Harris to gov-Injustice

U.N.B. New Brunswick?

link on Title to here Tree-sitters Leaved a comment?

On Tuesday morning, the University of California at Berkeley began the process of dismantling the support structures including platforms and traverse cable that had been used by the Berkeley tree-sitters who have occupied the Oak Grove for the past 18 months. The tree-sitters are attempting to stop the University from leveling the grove for a planned sports training facility.
November 21st, 2006

NEW! Sign the Free Josh Wolf petition!

Josh Wolf, freelance journalist and independent videographer, is currently in “coercive custody” at the Federal Detention Facility in Dublin, California. He is not charged with any crime and is being held under civil contempt. Wolf was incarcerated in July 2006 after resisting a subpoena to testify before a Federal Grand jury and for refusing to turn over his source material for video he shot of a San Francisco protest against the G8 Summit in 2005. His incarceration is virtually unprecedented. As of February 6 he is now the longest imprisoned journalist in U.S. history for failure to comply with a subpoena.

Having covered protests for several years as part of the San Francisco press corps, Wolf has gained exclusive access to much of the Bay Area’s activist community. Access denied to other journalists. Throughout Wolf’s ordeal, he has expressed concerns that this case is an attempt by federal prosecutors to out anarchists and his attorneys have argued that the grand jury investigation is a fishing expedition. Wolf has repeatedly stated under oath that his unpublished material does not contain footage of any of the alleged crimes committed. In a show of good faith, Wolf has offered to let the judge review his tape.

The Honorable Judge William Alsup refused.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Hollywood PARASITE?


noun = an animal or plant living on or in another; a person living off someone else but

giving ,nothing in return?

LEECH = A SMALL BLOOD SUCKING WORM?????

Look at Canlii.org and leave a Comment on what you think ?


Legal Assistant:
Elizabeth Branscombe



A seasoned lawyer who is a recognized authority in expropriation law, Doug Caldwell has over 30 years of providing first-class legal counsel behind him. His main areas of practice are commercial litigation and administrative law. He also plays a key role in the firm's Tax Planning/Commercial Litigation team, and on insurance audits and assignments and in our Construction Law Group. He has authored an extensive list of articles, contributed to legal textbooks and was recently selected to be published in Lexpert, Canada's legal directory as one of Canada's top lawyers. Before Doug's legal career, he had a distinguished career as an Officer for the Royal 22nd Regiment (the "Van Doos") in the Canadian Army.

Qualifications

  • LL.B. (Dalhousie University, 1970)
  • B.A. (Royal Military College, 1963)
  • College Militaire Royal, St. Jean, Que. (1958-1961)
  • Bar Admission: Nova Scotia 1970

Professional Experience

  • Appeared in all Courts and major administrative tribunals in Nova Scotia, the Tax Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada, as well as numerous appearances before the Supreme Court of Canada
  • Practice includes significant experience in assessment appeals, construction disputes, securities litigation, income tax appeals, tax fraud and evasion, expropriation, corporate and business disputes, planning and zoning litigation, and school board arbitration
  • Practice includes major multi-party civil litigation, using computerized litigation support systems

Professional Activities and Affiliations

  • Member - Nova Scotia Barristers` Society
  • Chief Commissioner - Nova Scotia Liquor Commission (1996-2001)
  • Director - Colchester-East Hants Education Foundation
  • Member - Ontario Expropriation Association

Lectures and Publications

  • Contributing author to Coates & Waque, "The New Law of Expropriation", Carswell 1994
  • Lecturer Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators, Regional Conference, Ottawa, Ont. 1991
  • Regular lecturer on expropriation matters to various interested parties
  • Lecturer on the Law of Tender to the annual meeting of the Nova Scotia Union of Municipalities, Legal Section, 1996
  • Lecturer, Eastern Regional Conference of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 1999
  • "Valuation of Special Purpose Industrial Property: Quantifying Economic Obsolescence Using Business Valuation Techniques", co-authored with Brian Keough, CBV, presented at the Eastern Regional Conference of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators, Ottawa, 1991
  • Contributing author on expropriation to "The Expert: A Practitioners Guide", Carswell, 1996
  • "Valuing Expropriation/Condemnation Claims", International Business Brokers` Association Journal, Spring Summer 1996
  • "The Law of Tender in Municipal Construction Projects", September 1991; revised October 1996
  • "Professional Discipline - Establishing the Playing Field: The Legislative Framework", February 1996
  • "Expropriations: a Legal and Valuation Perspective", Ontario Expropriation Association, Fall 1999, co-authored with Paula D. Frederick, C.A., C.B.V. Published Ontario Expropriation Association Newsletter Fall 1999
  • "Anticipated Value in Expropriation Compensation Claims of Resource Properties", The Canadian Appraiser, Winter 2000, reprinted in the Ontario Expropriation Association Newsletter Spring 2002
  • "Corporate Governance of Crown Corporations", January, 2000 Refer: www.propertyexpropriation.com
  • Lecturer Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators Atlantic Workshop 2002, "Expert Witness Testimony"
  • "Selection of Discount Rates in Expropriation Matters", presented at the CICBV Atlantic Workshop, Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators, June 2004
I wounder what he thought i did for a living? H.A.R.Construction ltd.

Office: Truro
Tel: 902-897-2000 Doug Caldwell has over 30 years of providing first-class legal counsel behind him.


boy what would i got if he had 40 years ? 10 years before i would get to court?

Do lawyers work on time? leave a comment and stay tune