Sunday, December 31, 2006
Richard letter for Information to the Minister of Transportation has been referred to DAVID D. EIDT
Eidt (quots) ? We , note ( is He talking the Minister here,
or John Raymond , Heather, Pugh, Boss, that Questions-1,3,
4,and 5 . ? What happen to questions TWO. Regarding Appendix-2 Whitch is a property List dated March 15/2005.
Waasis Road Interchange to Geary Interchange; Reference
#39 to 88-PID from 601123106 to 6010176- I would appreciate receiving a copy of the undated drawing (appendix
2A or the part that indicates reference to property 39 to 88.
? How many drawings are there.?I would appreciate receiving a copy of the drawing on the property list that indicates the Highway alignment line going on Reference #55
PID-60047909, owner IRVING OIL Limited. ? was there a sketch of this property prior to December,1996,and if so, I would appreciate receiving a copy.
Now this is where the first alignment line was up to December
11,1996. acoarding to the new paper,( the Oromocto post)
now who would really benefit with this last minutes Changs?.
One of the biggest one was MRDC - Doug Young,? And Eight year latter his Law Firm
Patterson Palmer LAW, LOOK AT s-z on site http://www.pattersonpalmer.ca/lawyer_cv.cfm?id=99
Who is David Eidt Working For ? Who is the new Minister WorkingFor,.
See you tomorrow for more. new years will be the start of 10 year, of torment, touchering.
Friday, December 29, 2006
Right to Information Act,&Ombudsman,& Constitutional Rights
Regarding Appendix 2- The reference NBDOT Proprty List 3/15/2005,Wassis Road Interchange to Geary Interchange;Reference #39,to,88-PID#601123106 to 6010176-
I Would Appreciate receving a copy of the Undated Drawing (as Appendix 2A or the part that indicates
reference to Property -39 to 88. ? how many Drawings are there.?
I would appreciate receiving a copy of the Drawing on the
property list that indicates the highway line going on Reference # 55,PID -60047909, Owner IRVING OIL Limited. Was there a sketch of this property prior to December,1996,and if so,I would Appreciate receiving a copy.
Now in Oromocto post news paper on Wednesday March,27,1996. (it Quotes) Smith Subdivision &Evergreen Acres Big Losers in proposed new TCH route.? what the new
TCH route means to you.
When did Richard Harris sale the Haneytown,General store,building. After the renovating to duplex,sale started in
February 1996, and by March of 1996 was a done deal.
what was going on In 1992,1993 with the IRVING Property?
property #55 PID.60047909, work was started on a Gravel
pad for a Irving Big Stop ? But the work stop by 1994. So will
the Irving be paid for the work they did on there Property.
It was a wast for sure, As we know they had to buy more land.
Regarding Appendix 2A- When And At what Time was the Highway
center line added to this Drawing ? Why is there only a circle around number 82 and not around
Numbers 77,78,and 80.?? Now Richard Harris owne 2 building Lots. H.A.R. owen approvable 16 more lots. A total of 18 left
from 19,lots when i bought this land to make a liveing.
Why is there no property reference number on the property
list number 59,(Brown,Lester J.& Myrtle,V )?? I will let you
know latter what I was told in 1998 by DOT minister office
and by Frank McKenna Office of how much Money that owner list # 59 Received , It a good thing these People was not under Oath,in Court ,Like 2 DOT,employee,? will the
OMBUDSMAN INVESTIGATE OR NOT,/??
will I Get the Right To Information ACT.?or not.
I Would Appreciate receving a copy of the Undated Drawing (as Appendix 2A or the part that indicates
reference to Property -39 to 88. ? how many Drawings are there.?
I would appreciate receiving a copy of the Drawing on theproperty list that indicates the highway line going on Reference # 55,PID -60047909, Owner IRVING OIL Limited. Was there a sketch of this property prior to December,1996,and if so,I would Appreciate receiving a copy.
Now in Oromocto post news paper on Wednesday March,27,1996. (it Quotes) Smith Subdivision &Evergreen Acres Big Losers in proposed new TCH route.? what the new
TCH route means to you.
When did Richard Harris sale the Haneytown,General store,building. After the renovating to duplex,sale started in
February 1996, and by March of 1996 was a done deal.
what was going on In 1992,1993 with the IRVING Property?
property #55 PID.60047909, work was started on a Gravel
pad for a Irving Big Stop ? But the work stop by 1994. So will
the Irving be paid for the work they did on there Property.
It was a wast for sure, As we know they had to buy more land.
Regarding Appendix 2A- When And At what Time was the Highway
center line added to this Drawing ? Why is there only a circle around number 82 and not around
Numbers 77,78,and 80.?? Now Richard Harris owne 2 building Lots. H.A.R. owen approvable 16 more lots. A total of 18 left
from 19,lots when i bought this land to make a liveing.
Why is there no property reference number on the property
list number 59,(Brown,Lester J.& Myrtle,V )?? I will let you
know latter what I was told in 1998 by DOT minister office
and by Frank McKenna Office of how much Money that owner list # 59 Received , It a good thing these People was not under Oath,in Court ,Like 2 DOT,employee,? will the
OMBUDSMAN INVESTIGATE OR NOT,/??
will I Get the Right To Information ACT.?or not.
Now this is page One of three PAGE Letter
Asking for the Right to INFORMATION from Landry,??This is Request for information regarding the above -noted case. The only one type was File Number
100/05/CA. Please Find Attached hereto following.
IN total 18-pages Fax ,now if i pile all the letter , Appraisal
reports, Documents,Discovery volume book,trial briefts,and so on ,the pile would be at less six feet tail.
Now this is not tacking into account the ten bankers boxes
of File that the Patterson Palmer Law firm Lawyers in Truro Nova Scotia has. The Law Society of New Brunswick
of New Brunswick sent me a copy of a letter from NS Lawyer
Robert H Pineo to Jamie C. Eddy ,that said ,he would VET ?
the ten bankers boxes of file before he would return then.? Well maybe there will only be nine
Bankers Boxes left for me to keep safe and dry, oboy maybe I see some DOCUMENTS that I have not seen before EDDY ship then to N.S. ? Maybe if Eddy get then back for me. Maybe
Government Lawyer David D Eidt will let Jamie add to his Bill , O well like at the Meeting we had in Moncton on February 1,2000, when NS lawyer Douglas A.Caldwell said don't worry about Goodwin bill to you the Taxpayer will pay. ( Goodwin bill was 70,thousand dollors,and was
growing at this time.) I had pay him 21,thousand dollors, and my Lawyer was telling me not to
worry about owing Goodwin 50,more Thousand. Boy what good advice, Taxpayers paying?
The taxpayer did pay a lot in the McLeod V. NB.,[2000]N.B.R.(2d) (Supp.)No.13 (TD)
?? I will supplies a web Site latter on so you can see for your self. Keep looking it will be soon.
Thursday, December 28, 2006
Fax Cover sheet,RIGHT TO INFORMITON ACT
To :Denis Landry ,Minister of Transpotation,Oct,25/06
Re: to Court file No:100/05/CA. Fact, this is the Court of
Appeal file Number , Now Look at Denis Landry to Richard A.
Harris ,Dated November 28,2006 And you will see that the
Court File Number was Change to F/C/328/00 ? now this
Case started the Court file No.100/05/ca. The Court of Appeal of New Brunswick. What I think here is this is more deliberately delaying tactic. ( see letter of Nov,28/06 latter )
in Blog.
Now i ask for the Informition on Oct,25,2006 after i went to the Ombudsman office, In September 2006 and did up the three pages letter to Denis Landy ,?the new Minister of Shawn Graham , Now Remenber The Frank McKenna Liberal started this Fight or Court War,on my self in 1997, When they shift the alinement of the Highway on or about December 11,1996 (meeting at Oromocto town hull to benefit some property owner. (see photography in this Blog latters) look at Sunday ,December 10,2006 at http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ there not much different going on with the Shawn Graham Christmas gift Nine Year Latter,???? What do you think about Lift,
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
make Government EMPLOYEE,Responsible to society
: injusticecoalition@hotmail.comSubject: [gov-Injustice] Calling for help from public :to contact [Email=injusticecoalition@hotmail.com] or letter Richard A Harris ,721 Irvine street, Apt.#40 Fredericton NB. E3A,3E8 Or call 506-260-7960
I need help to find these 4 pending Taxations victims as to this letter October 24,2006 ?
Four expropriated Cases of the NS lawyers getting sponsor by NB Tax payers to take people property away.
Not counting my COST from 1997 and on going Day by day ,year by year .
The PATTERSON, PALMER , NS BILL is=$153,828.69
The NB, Patterson,Palmer,Bill is=$42,921.45
The Total of oustandingLawyers bill of there costs =$212,359.86 on File #328/oo
Now look at the McLeod Case of Cost of Taxations of June 22,2000. Patterson,Palmer,Hunt,Murphy was $201,228.01 W.H. Goodwin Account = $83,350.24=for a total of =$333,333.01 ?
Now look at Counsel on PPHM letter Head= Hon,M.Douglas Young . p.c. Now is this left over Sponsorshit or Sponsorship, will Graham shake up the office of the Attorney General or will he pass the buck and blame to the fromer Liberal Frank Government. ( Question: ) when did the N.B.Government Knew what was to take place in almost all EXPROPRIATION Cases.?? The Second ISSUE is ,Will I get to look at NS lawyer Robert Pineo AFFIDAVIT,?
OR will it be like when I ask the Minister Denis Landry for Information about the 4 lane cordoor Survey work.
when was it Done.? Was it before December 11,1996, or After in March 1997.?
When did they have plans to move the Alinement.?? Did TRA Food Get wind of chang. Because They offer me $ 250,000 for the store building and all the land early march of 1995.
The third ISSUE will I be Allow to enter AFFIDAVIT with my Bill ? If I ever get my 10 banker boxes of file back. Like the one I had ready to enter At discovery 2004 , sign by Commissioner of Oaths on March 16,2004 but now I will need a up dated one as soon as I get my 10 bankers boxes of file back.????
Is there any one out there that would have time to help me on these Matters. --Posted by Richard A. Harris to gov-Injustice at 12/21/2006 04:53:00 AM edit post
I need help to find these 4 pending Taxations victims as to this letter October 24,2006 ?
Four expropriated Cases of the NS lawyers getting sponsor by NB Tax payers to take people property away.
Not counting my COST from 1997 and on going Day by day ,year by year .
The PATTERSON, PALMER , NS BILL is=$153,828.69
The NB, Patterson,Palmer,Bill is=$42,921.45
The Total of oustandingLawyers bill of there costs =$212,359.86 on File #328/oo
Now look at the McLeod Case of Cost of Taxations of June 22,2000. Patterson,Palmer,Hunt,Murphy was $201,228.01 W.H. Goodwin Account = $83,350.24=for a total of =$333,333.01 ?
Now look at Counsel on PPHM letter Head= Hon,M.Douglas Young . p.c. Now is this left over Sponsorshit or Sponsorship, will Graham shake up the office of the Attorney General or will he pass the buck and blame to the fromer Liberal Frank Government. ( Question: ) when did the N.B.Government Knew what was to take place in almost all EXPROPRIATION Cases.?? The Second ISSUE is ,Will I get to look at NS lawyer Robert Pineo AFFIDAVIT,?
OR will it be like when I ask the Minister Denis Landry for Information about the 4 lane cordoor Survey work.
when was it Done.? Was it before December 11,1996, or After in March 1997.?
When did they have plans to move the Alinement.?? Did TRA Food Get wind of chang. Because They offer me $ 250,000 for the store building and all the land early march of 1995.
The third ISSUE will I be Allow to enter AFFIDAVIT with my Bill ? If I ever get my 10 banker boxes of file back. Like the one I had ready to enter At discovery 2004 , sign by Commissioner of Oaths on March 16,2004 but now I will need a up dated one as soon as I get my 10 bankers boxes of file back.????
Is there any one out there that would have time to help me on these Matters. --Posted by Richard A. Harris to gov-Injustice at 12/21/2006 04:53:00 AM edit post
Calling all Expropriation Victims to start a coalition.
ItÂ’s near Christmas for therefore IÂ’m not going to go on a tirade of the many reasons weÂ’re protesting a Elimination of the New Brunswick Human Rights Day on Janua24th4th in front of the main office on Brunswick Street. I will say that the Commission hasnÂ’t held a tribunal in years compare to Nova Scotia that hold over 10 tribunals per year.The Commission is a total disgrace in New Brunswick. They held a Canadian Human Rights Conference last June but we didnÂ’t protest this little shameful meeting. These appointed individuals do not care for human rights in this Province and must be Investigation The final straw was when they came out with their annual report last week. They never mentioned the issue of the poor. They had more complaints than the year before but no tribunals hearings. The question is why? Is someone being paid to back off? In my case? Well? I have been fighting with these people for the last 7 years. Just go to the top of this blog to search this blog-New Brunswick Human Rights Commission.ThereÂ’s all kinds of information in there. Enjoy!IÂ’ll go more into the details in the new year. This is going to get really dirty. I tried to talk to the Commission but to no avail.They believe that New Brunswickers rights should be ignored.Stay tuned
well here a new one ( The Right to have Justice)(The Right to have a fair Trial and a Fair unbias Decision Made, on June 3-2005, Before Mr.Justice David H.Russell
The Right to Get Information and evidence of perjury ,that there was lying under oath by the following people
Heather .Pugh ,John Raymond,of the Department of Trasportation.Now look at these person salary (over $130,000.thousand a Year) Look at there Salvation,?to retire,with regular pay.
well here a new one ( The Right to have Justice)(The Right to have a fair Trial and a Fair unbias Decision Made, on June 3-2005, Before Mr.Justice David H.Russell
The Right to Get Information and evidence of perjury ,that there was lying under oath by the following people
Heather .Pugh ,John Raymond,of the Department of Trasportation.Now look at these person salary (over $130,000.thousand a Year) Look at there Salvation,?to retire,with regular pay.
Now look at this Letter from the Ombudsman ,that I received December 26/06
Date of December 18,2006, Quote, Conversation with Christian Whalen last week,
? told him about letter of Mr.David Eidt-Office of Attorney General
Look at Minister Denis Landry Letter to Richard A. Harris dated November 28,2006 Now he notes that there two Subject Harris V. Her Majesty the Queen,
DOT:Court File F/C/328/00;now this Case Decision of David Russell came down June 3,2005 . The Right to Information was for the Court of Appeal of New,Brunswick File: No.100/05/CA.
Now look at letter of David Eidt,to Mr.Harris Dated December 13,2006 on Pargrafh
four. Quote, The Department of Transportation therefore will not be answering any of the Questions appearing in your letter or in your fax cover sheet in response to right to information request. ? why will DOT not Answer ! Because,if they Answer one way it will show Perjury. If they Answer the other way ,it will show that they Deliberatery set out to dely and finances ruin Richard Harris.
The Evidence is that they knew my attendant self Enployment with the Land.
Now back to Right, Constitution Rights Under the heading "Mobility Rights " (a)
To move to and take up residence in any Province:;and
(B) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.
The right to have the Ombudsman of NB, See To Right to Information Act,C,R-10.3
Not to let The DOT Government Minister Denis Landry Past the buck to David Eidt
That will keep on Delaying the matter of not being able to Move out to Alberta
where I can be with my Family, and rebuild what life i have left.
I belived i went to the Ombudsman to get Answer, and belived this is there
responsibility of there position.? or are they a Government delaying Tactic.
Fmr B.C. lobbyist to seek adjournment at law society hearing
By GREG JOYCE
VANCOUVER (CP) - Counsel for the Law Society of Upper Canada and former B.C. lobbyist Eric Bornmann will make a joint submission Tuesday that his scheduled 'good character' hearing be adjourned.
The hearing for Bornmann, who has completed his law article in Toronto and wants to practise law in Ontario, was scheduled to be heard Tuesday in Toronto.
Bornmann is alleged to have paid almost $30,000 to three B.C. government officials in exchange for government information and is a key witness at an upcoming trial that flows from a raid on the B.C. legislature.
Instead of a full hearing to determine whether he is fit to be allowed to practise law, a law society spokeswoman said both sides had agreed to seek an adjournment.
Lawyers will inform the hearing panel when they want the hearing to reconvene - if the adjournment is granted - but the law society is on record as saying it wants the hearing adjourned until after Bornmann testifies at a trial starting in Vancouver next month.
A police raid on the B.C. legislature in December 2003 resulted in charges against three former government employees. ? (NB. employees Knew about NS, Lawyer and H .W. Goodwin as John Raymond was in Court on the McLeod V. NB.;[2000]NBR(2d)supp.)No.112(TD) NOW? Look at
His Letter to the LAW SOCIETY in 1998, setting the Stage,for protection,of the Government
Sponsorship of NS lawyers and NB appraisaler of giving taxpayer money away to MRDC owen
LAW Firm Patterson,Palmer,Hunt,Murphy, (where Government could Victimize a person out
of His Hole Life Work, by using legual Tacties, ( such as Rules of Court,Rules of Civil procedure,
Limitation of time to a action in Court, The Expropriation Act,Date for Filing Post-Trial Briefs:
that the Applicants will not see till after sent to Judge, The Pleading,and so on.Like a Motions Court recoarding being discoury, Evidence that Lawyers Deliveley delay the Matters, and so on.
Dave Basi, a former aide to then-finance minister Gary Collins, and Robert Virk, who worked for former transport minister Judith Reid, both faces charges of fraud, breach of trust and influence peddling.
Last April, several court documents were released on the case including four separate applications by the RCMP in 2004 to obtain search warrants.
In one application, the Crown contends Dave Basi accepted a benefit from Bornmann and committed a breach of trust. (My , Lawyers entering Meno of Heather Pugh as a Applicants
Exhibit. when they knew there was on Meeting with her on the 17 day of December 1996 . That application alleges that Bornmann "received information and documents from Dave Basi in exchange for payments which were made to Aneal Basi for forwarding to Dave Basi."
Another application alleges that Dave Basi received the money from Bornmann in return for Basi's referring clients to him and assisting him with "matters of government."
Aneal Basi was a public affairs officer in the Transport Ministry.
The warrants allege that Aneal Basi passed funds from Bornmann to Dave Basi.
"These funds were in the form of cheques written to Aneal Basi, deposited to the account of Aneal Basi, and it is believed, disbursed to David Basi as part of the arrangement with Erik Bornmann," the court documents allege.
None of the allegations against them have been proven in court.
On the law society's website, the society says it would seek the adjournment until after Bornmann testifies, or the criminal matter is withdrawn or the trial is concluded.
Counsel for Bornmann, prior to the joint motion, were going to propose a motion at his hearing that it be held behind closed doors, or that a publication ban be ordered until the Vancouver trial is completed.
A summary of some search warrant information had already been released before the RCMP applications
Do you see what is going on Behind closed doors in the two Action on my matters.
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
From: "Richard A. Harris" To: injusticecoalition@hotmail.comSubject: [gov-Injustice] Calling for help from published: the, 21 Dec 2006 04:43:26 -0800 (PST)
[Email=injusticecoalition@hotmail.com] or letter Richard A Harris ,721 Irvine street, Apt.#40 Fredericton NB. E3A,3E8Or call 506-260-7960 I need help to find these 4 pending Taxations victims as to this letter October 24,2006 ?Four expropriated Cases of the NS lawyers getting sponsor by NB Tax payers to take people property away.Not counting my COST from 1997 PATTERSON,PALMER , NS BILL=$153,828.69 NB, Patterson,Palmer,=$42,921.42Total of oustanding bill of there costs =$212,359.86Now look at the McLeod Case of Cost of Taxations June 22,2000 Patterson,Palmer,Hunt,Murphy $201,228.01 W.H. Goodwin Account = $83,350.24 total =$333,333.01 ? Now look at Counsel on PPHM letter Head= Hon,M.Douglas Young . p.c.Now is this left over Sponsorshit or Sponsorship, will Graham shake up the office of the Attorney General or will he pass the buck to Miles?? Question: when did the N.B.Government Knew what was to take place in almost all EXPROPRIATION Cases.?? The Second ISSUE Will I get to look at NS lawyer Robert Pineo AFFIDAVIT,? OR will it be like when I ask the Minister Denis Landry for Information about the 4 lane cordoor Survey work. when was it Done.? Was it before December 11,1996, or in March 1997.?When did they have plans to move the Alinement.?? did TRA Food Get wind of chang. The third ISSUE will I be Allow to enter AFFIDAVIT with my Bill ? Like the one I had ready to enter At discovery 2004 , sign by Commissioner of Oaths on March 16,2004 but now I will need a up dated one as soon as I get my 10 bankers boxes of file back.???? Is there any one out there that would have time to help me on these Matters. --Posted by Richard A. Harris to gov-Injustice at 12/21/2006 04:53:00 AM
[Email=injusticecoalition@hotmail.com]
Need a Lawyer Help to Move this Case of ???
,??????? I can't tell you any more now, because I got to go to Work at the new dead end job of the Government Propaganda Systens.of Deep pocketing Tacit, (2 )Report used in the Expropriation case , (The file # F/C/328/oo ) this is one reason I Retainer I was advisees in early 2001 by LAWYER BOB that in order to take or start a ACTION against Mr. Goodwin ,that I would need an Appraisal d the Number two Appraiser Mr.Babineau [see attached faxed correspondence dated April 3,2001 ? which should have been in Mr. Babineau's file or notes ,and was not.] ?? Build lots worth 16, to 25,000.dollars each. (3). also is Attached is page 90 from the Goodwin's draft report. The third or forth paragraph down, now EXPLAINS TO ME how this an independent appraiser would know what is being faxed by a Governments worker Ross little..? ! I confirm I had no Knowledge of any of this until August, 2001, two weeks before Discovery of September 11th and 12 th 2001. So, how did Mr. Goodwin of these incidents which were occurring at D.O.T. in 1999. On or About February 13.1997, I went to N.B. D.o.T.planning office with a drawing that I received from the Development Officer, Lonnie Forbes, a drawing dated 12/96. I drew a red line on it indicated where DOT could have saved the salt and sand storage buildings, by taking all of total Property of mine, by doing this.? Now if Mr. Forbes had Plan # 82? That Mr. Goodwin was aware of; he did not provide it to me. He did not even provide it with his letter to me dated February 5, 1997, Which was received in mail on or about February 13, 1997, now this was after Steven LeBlanc meeting with Marilyn Harris and Richard Harris on February 12, 1997, [look at Discovery 2001 Exhibit 21, and then take a look at Heather Pugh memo and what she seed in Court,?? Now look at Mr. Justice David H. Russell, June 3, /05 Decision on paragraph [51] quote, I accept Ms.Pugh's Evidence as being factual. I conclude Mr. Harris did meet with Heather Pugh on the date mentioned in the memo, now think about this my wife Marilyn did not get of work till 4.30 pm, on the December 17/96 and the: only Public Meeting of December 11; 1996 that people did not know about, the drawing with a date of 12/96 .the one that Lonnie Forbes, sent me. Now look at Sheldon Lee letter of May,28/1997 that I will not know about tile September 2001 , this lead me, QUOTE I do not believe this plan # 82 was not even prepared until March ,1997 because the Road center line as indicated on plan #82 must have come of a another survey sketch and the survey work.? So why would they have the survey work done before December 17, 1996. (4) My appraiser, Mr. Babineau, used Chapter 14 of the Expropriation Act, (section 45,) where a Business is located on the land Expropriated, DISTURBANCE DAMAGE, include DAMAGES.....(FACT Land that would make 18 lots in one located,) see Attached letter from Whitehead Bird & Miles Dated October 6,1997, to DOT. This letter was forwarded with out my Knowledge, I had by this date. Already sold my Gravel pit, .and the Land had no FUTURE development potential for me, Allen Miles Esq., was the Lawyer who arranged for the sale of my Gravel Pit. ?? (5) On or About September 19 ,2006, I went to the Court of Queen Bench of New Brunswick, to get a copy of the Recording of what was said in Court by Judge P.Garnett.On the Motion that was on January 30,2002, on Motion Recorded Dated of December 19,2001 ,Which contained an Affidavit of Service date December 5 ,2001 and Affidavit of John S. Raymond sworn to December,5/ 2001 . At the Motion Hearing, there was no Affidavit of Response from the Applicant's Lawyers. I Richard A. Harris only found out about the Affidavit of Mr. Raymond on September 19,2006 .[Jamie Eddy ,failure to keep the client reasonable informed:;# 2 Withholding information from the Client or Misleading the Client. #3 Failure to make ever effort to provide prom service to the Client. # 4 acted in a matter when there was or was likely be a Confecting Interest. ??? (5) I Richard Harris Found out on September 19/06 ,that there was another Motion Scheduled for April 23, 2002, that I was unaware of until September 19,2006 ? This one Contained a three page Memorandum of Law, Particulars and Pleadings. With no response from Jamie Eddy, Esq. the Lawyer. There was an Exhibit "D" Filed (page 19-30) which I saw for the First Time on September 19, 2006 and also an ORDER of Madam Justice Paulette Garnett, the Same Judge, who heard the Settlement Conference Hearing on February, 2005. There was yet another AFFIDAVIT of John S. Raymond, sworn to on April 8, 2002, contained in the Court File Number F/C/828/00. ?? Now what kind of Justice is this, a government employ, who is costing the Taxpayer million of dollars that will be rewarded with a Government pension for being responsible? Give me a break, look at the McLeod Case. What a Justice Systems, NOW Raymond is also an AACI Appraiser, member of New Brunswick Association of real Estate Appraisers that was put in place in 1995, buy the Government. Just after they knew that they would be building a four lane highway. (6).On or about April 8,2002 , Aberdeen Holdings Ltd. Filed a small Claims Action against me, Richard Harris, Which are Disturbance and Damages that Flowed from this land Expropriation and loss of my Intended self work,.[see attached list of Documents sent to N.B.lawyer John B Logan on or About November 8, 2000] Because I loss my Planned Employment of 1997, it became apparent that a stop work was in place by February 12,1997, (6-A) I intent to enter a victim’s Impact Statement to the Justice System regarding these Matters, that started February 12,1997 and on going to day.??? (7) The Seven Main Outstanding Issues Now on September 28/06= are
Monday, December 25, 2006
From: "Richard A. Harris" To: injusticecoalition@hotmail.comSubject: [gov-Injustice] Calling for help from PublicDate:
[Email=injusticecoalition@hotmail.com] or letter Richard A Harris ,721 Irvine street, Apt.#40 Fredericton NB. E3A,3E8Or call 506-260-7960 I need help to find these 4 pending Taxations victims as to this letter October 24,2006 ?Four expropriated Cases of the NS lawyers getting sponsor by NB Tax payers to take people property away.Not counting my COST from 1997 PATTERSON,PALMER , NS BILL=$153,828.69 NB, Patterson,Palmer,=$42,921.42Total of oustanding bill of there costs =$212,359.86Now look at the McLeod Case of Cost of Taxations June 22,2000 Patterson,Palmer,Hunt,Murphy $201,228.01 W.H. Goodwin Account = $83,350.24 total =$333,333.01 ? Now look at Counsel on PPHM letter Head= Hon,M.Douglas Young . p.c.Now is this left over Sponsorshit or Sponsorship, will Graham shake up the office of the Attorney General or will he pass the buck to Miles?? Question: when did the N.B.Government Knew what was to take place in almost all EXPROPRIATION Cases.?? The Second ISSUE Will I get to look at NSA lawyer Robert pine AFFIDAVIT,? OR will it be like when I ask the Minister Denis Landry for Information about the 4 lane cordoor Survey work. when was it Done.? Was it before December 11,1996, or in March 1997.?When did they have plans to move the Alinement.?? did TRA Food Get wind of Chang. The third ISSUE will I be Allow to enter AFFIDAVIT with my Bill ? Like the one I had ready to enter At discovery 2004 , sign by Commissioner of Oaths on March 16,2004 but now I will need a up dated one as soon as I get my 10 bankers boxes of file back.???? Is there any one out there that would have time to help me on these Matters
[Email=injusticecoalition@hotmail.com]
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Frank ,Liberals, Lord Tools Feeds
From Charles blog Let keep thing Right>
he’s saying? The Lord Government force him to accept a deal to sell his land at a lower price for a new Four Lane Highway. Judge RUssell Was the one the Government use, he know about the NS lawyer Caldwell and Goodwin ? give me a break Russell is God,or think he is.? if i deside to make Justices. play god, ? do you think any one cares about anyones about anyone.I don’t know the whole details so maybe Richard could write a few issues in this blog? Who knows?
Charles it was not the Lord Government that started this fight to have a life .It was Frank Liberals that was in powers back then. Now the biggest Issuse to day 10 year latter is i have no dreams left,?i would like to be out west with my grand Daughter and Daughter Aimee , >? But I seized here , not in less i give up on the law suits"s The other way i could move on with my lift is to get a lawyer >.
Issuse (1) It doz not look like any other lawyer want to be Invouled in these Matters Next time
you talk to Harold ask him y he think i can 't get a lawyer and he will probley tell you that Law system's is gear up if a lawyer was to help me .
he would be Ruined in the future , now look at my blog ,Look what took place in Court,there
was no mida reporter in my court case, ? if it was not for Cbc news i think you would be behind bar, do you know how many Constitution rights i loss.
one is every Citizen of Canada has the right to move to and take up residence in any Province.?
To Pursue a gaining of a livelihood in any province, ??? 10, years seized in march 2007/? so maybe you can shed some light on these Issues Do you know that they Will set out to brake you down to give up on lift, ? rule of Court ? do you know that the lawyer will not give me back my file, dozes this not seized me.? if i don "t have a lawyer the land was. That I loss 9 building lots and was only paid $ 2,700. dollars for, buy JUDGE Russell ? Where could you even get one Lot anyware in NB @ $2,7oo hundred Dollars.?
this land was in the name of my compety H.A.R. construction name ? so to the Appeal Court it look like a Joke,??????? see what i mean ? if i say to muck about the X lawyers before i get back my File ??? they will cover there track ?? with meno or AFFIDAVIT ?
: i know now that Affidavit is knotting but pleading,,,,Meno are Evidence to back up Affidavit do u see what i mean,here, ? this is why my 10 bankers boxes of file are in NS, The life seizeding games
The Government use the Tax Payers Money and my tax Dollars to Seized you till you give Up, or Die,
My Right to get Information to proved that Heather Pughs lie in Court About a meeting with me.
LOOK what go on now ? your Investigtion : NS police My Was Lawyers Of NS,yours==I think Attoney General office of NB, My was NB law Society To get File Back.? Did the Police do Rong,? Did NB Lawyers do Rong?
When will you Know,?Why would they lets you Know If i get Back my File ? less chanch for
NS Lawyers to be Paid by NB tax payers
How long will you be seized from knowing. How long befor I will See the NS Lawyers
Affidavit that was part of there Bill of Costs.
This is what I think if NS police find NB Police Rong.? NB Law Society All ready Letter Me
If you get A Lawyers and Go all the way to Court, More or less side they are not
The NB Taxpayer will be Giving so Lawyer Money.? Getting my File Back. ? what
Look what this Law Case will Costs, Then the Judge is the Law Society JOB?
may say you are on income ,so you had no loss.? This is what happen at my Trial
Logice here is that N.B tax payers will Say you are just I did not get any help from 1997
a complainer on welfares, See what i saying here. till February 2001, took heart
The Government Legal System is not Right.? Attack in Oct,1999, after this
was paying $300,.oo per.month for pile
Why Did i seek help in 2001, loss my Work in 1997 in 2001 there was three law Cases on going (1the Bank one) the divorce one The loss of my work of 1997? I did not only lose a wift ? i loss the health plain =$300.per month, Moraga of $900.00 per month and so on.
I ask for assistanie in 1998 but was Told you got RRSP Money ?When that is gone Come and See us. Now in Summer of 1999 i got a Draft Report with a Bill for $70,000.plus.Now this was only week after my now X wife told me May 31,99 that she did not love me any more?
ps i got to go to work now talk at you latter,m Charles blog
he’s saying? The Lord Government force him to accept a deal to sell his land at a lower price for a new Four Lane Highway. Judge RUssell Was the one the Government use, he know about the NS lawyer Caldwell and Goodwin ? give me a break Russell is God,or think he is.? if i deside to make Justices. play god, ? do you think any one cares about anyones about anyone.I don’t know the whole details so maybe Richard could write a few issues in this blog? Who knows?
Charles it was not the Lord Government that started this fight to have a life .It was Frank Liberals that was in powers back then. Now the biggest Issuse to day 10 year latter is i have no dreams left,?i would like to be out west with my grand Daughter and Daughter Aimee , >? But I seized here , not in less i give up on the law suits"s The other way i could move on with my lift is to get a lawyer >.
Issuse (1) It doz not look like any other lawyer want to be Invouled in these Matters Next time
you talk to Harold ask him y he think i can 't get a lawyer and he will probley tell you that Law system's is gear up if a lawyer was to help me .
he would be Ruined in the future , now look at my blog ,Look what took place in Court,there
was no mida reporter in my court case, ? if it was not for Cbc news i think you would be behind bar, do you know how many Constitution rights i loss.
one is every Citizen of Canada has the right to move to and take up residence in any Province.?
To Pursue a gaining of a livelihood in any province, ??? 10, years seized in march 2007/? so maybe you can shed some light on these Issues Do you know that they Will set out to brake you down to give up on lift, ? rule of Court ? do you know that the lawyer will not give me back my file, dozes this not seized me.? if i don "t have a lawyer the land was. That I loss 9 building lots and was only paid $ 2,700. dollars for, buy JUDGE Russell ? Where could you even get one Lot anyware in NB @ $2,7oo hundred Dollars.?
this land was in the name of my compety H.A.R. construction name ? so to the Appeal Court it look like a Joke,??????? see what i mean ? if i say to muck about the X lawyers before i get back my File ??? they will cover there track ?? with meno or AFFIDAVIT ?
: i know now that Affidavit is knotting but pleading,,,,Meno are Evidence to back up Affidavit do u see what i mean,here, ? this is why my 10 bankers boxes of file are in NS, The life seizeding games
The Government use the Tax Payers Money and my tax Dollars to Seized you till you give Up, or Die,
My Right to get Information to proved that Heather Pughs lie in Court About a meeting with me.
LOOK what go on now ? your Investigtion : NS police My Was Lawyers Of NS,yours==I think Attoney General office of NB, My was NB law Society To get File Back.? Did the Police do Rong,? Did NB Lawyers do Rong?
When will you Know,?Why would they lets you Know If i get Back my File ? less chanch for
NS Lawyers to be Paid by NB tax payers
How long will you be seized from knowing. How long befor I will See the NS Lawyers
Affidavit that was part of there Bill of Costs.
This is what I think if NS police find NB Police Rong.? NB Law Society All ready Letter Me
If you get A Lawyers and Go all the way to Court, More or less side they are not
The NB Taxpayer will be Giving so Lawyer Money.? Getting my File Back. ? what
Look what this Law Case will Costs, Then the Judge is the Law Society JOB?
may say you are on income ,so you had no loss.? This is what happen at my Trial
Logice here is that N.B tax payers will Say you are just I did not get any help from 1997
a complainer on welfares, See what i saying here. till February 2001, took heart
The Government Legal System is not Right.? Attack in Oct,1999, after this
was paying $300,.oo per.month for pile
Why Did i seek help in 2001, loss my Work in 1997 in 2001 there was three law Cases on going (1the Bank one) the divorce one The loss of my work of 1997? I did not only lose a wift ? i loss the health plain =$300.per month, Moraga of $900.00 per month and so on.
I ask for assistanie in 1998 but was Told you got RRSP Money ?When that is gone Come and See us. Now in Summer of 1999 i got a Draft Report with a Bill for $70,000.plus.Now this was only week after my now X wife told me May 31,99 that she did not love me any more?
ps i got to go to work now talk at you latter,m Charles blog
I need a Lawyer and help.
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
RicksCorrectedLawSocietyofNewBrunswick.rtf (0.04 MB)
To Whom it may Concern: I started an action between W.H. Goodwin April 7th 2004. Why? Because there would be a limitation of time. I Had to serve him within at least 6 months. After the Discovery of 2004 on file FC/328/00, The expropriation file, I wanted a court date so I woudn’t have to serve Goodwin, but eventually I had to serve Goodwin. The day after Mr. Goodwin was served, I had a court date the same day. The problem is, in this action against Mr Goodwyn, I had been told I am not allowed to represent my company. The biggest losses in the expropriation property case, was in my company’s name (HAR contruction LTD) Mr Goodwin has a lawyer, Mr. Cameron, and he has a big insurance company paying his bills. I was forced to change my statement of claim Because of what went on in court on file FC/328/00 Because of the date we typed the survey letter, I was mistaken in the statement of claim. But I wasn’t mistaken about the first time I knew the highway was shifted. It was the day I talked to mr Colburn (December 20th). Mr Colburnwho was at the meeting in Oromocto Dec 11th 1996. When this shift was announced it would be taking place. (A shift is a highway alignment. ) I need some help hereby a lawyer that will go 50/50 on a lawsuit against Mr. Goodwin. Or help me bring a motion so that I could represent myself as to myself as to this file 92417 canada ltd. et al. V. Bomac Batten Ltd. I cannot afford to work and to keep on going the way I’ve been doing things. I also appealed the court case cause I feel that what went on in court would hurt me in this claim against Mr. Goodwin. This is why I appealed it. I have been told the same thing by the appeal court, that I am not aloud to represent my company (H.A.R Construction). So I need to bring a motion to the appeal court to represent my company. I also need to bring a motion to the appeals court and to add some relevant documents that were deliberately left out at the trial. I fell that I do not have a chance to continue without a lawyer being involved and to help me to take the right steps in the process of bringing Mr. Goodwin’s actions forward. Also, I believe there should be a claim against my lawyers. And their firm Pattterson Palmer Hunt and Murphy. As you will see, by reading the documents that I will supply you, I have been misled and they have been really negligent in bringing my case forward. I feel that they are wokring with the province and the justince system to really delay me, and to put me on the streets so that I cannot fight for my rights. As you can see on paragraph 3 on Goodwyn’s statement of claims on the minumum statement of claim that hasnt been registerd with the court yet, on paragraoh three, my net worth before I bought this property to work with, was over 600,000 dollars Canadian. And the evidence that this is really factual, because I had dsocuments to submit on discovery in 2004 which I wanted to probe my net worth so I would at least have the entitlement to put back where I was. My net worht when this expropriation took place was over 400,000. Today, I feel that I cannot do anything unless I get some money to put me back where I was. After Mr. Goodwyn was served, on August 17th, 2004, I received a letter form Patterson Pamer Hunt & Murpohy, form Mr Dugla (right->) Caldwell. He rights this letter veryfyg he knows about the 9 particulars. That I want added before Dicovery of March 2004.But he’s saying in thi letter you sent o Jujhe the 16th, which is improper because I got faxed proof that it was sent before the last Disovery. I woud also like to know, form a lawyer, if it would be possible, to start a brand new action in the Federal court court, against the apparaisal board, the association of appraisers, he appraiser Mr Carter, appraiser mr Goodwyn, the law firm and lawyers and dot and the provinces of new Brunswick. Due to the bad faith dealings with all these people, they have completely destroyed my life. I also feel that Judge Russell’s decision was very biased even with the facts that he made his decision on. And the briefings. The settlement conference briefings for one, that was full of misleading information, and the : date for filing post-trial briefs: April 11 & 18, 2005 they were mixing the information up so there was no way the judge could even make a fair decision by all parties involved. Because if you take Discovery Transcripts and the particulars, that wad deleted before the case that was , you can see in these discovery transcripts there was a lot of unfactual data that was presented to the judge. And The biggest thing based on the judges decision, as far as I could see. , was mrs Pew’s testimony, where she deliberately lied on the stand. If you look at Mr Goodwyn’s page 90 of his draft report, you can see that this thing was staged before the court trial even took place. So in other words, I wasted eight year fighting. I don’t want to waste no more of my life fighting, unless I’ve got somebody in my corner. They D.O.T. and the system as buried me in documentation. Also, I have got 40 some casette tapes talking to the premiers offices, talking to my lawyers, mainly, and with these 40 some tapes that could be made out as phone memoes that have grossly been misled and deliberately delayed. Note: if you don’t want to get really involved, just help me tke care of this matter. Also, Mr Carter’s file notes, there was a comment on a listing on a store, written by Mr Carter, I presume, where he had written down the word “Con Artist”and I feel my laeyers D.O.T. has gone to great lengths to make me look like a Con Artist. If you want to see take a look @ McLoed v. N.B., [2000] N.B.R.(2d) (Supp.) No. 13(TD) my judgement on this case would probably speak for itself. The lawyers and appraisers were all working together, they were all working as one big family. Look at the discovery of 2001 you’ll see that Fredericton appraisels did not even have appraisels. If I would have guaranteed mr Goodwyn 70, 000 dollars out of my claim against the province, I believe that this whole thing was set u between the lawyers, Carter and Goodwyn right at the beginning to come out similiar to the above stated case. The difference being that Mr. Goodwyn would have received $70,000 from myself. I wil supply you with the 42 pages that was sent to David Eidt leagla service branch, dated may the 12th, 2006. Whereby in a conversation with mr Eidht later on in the same day, Mr Eidhts was telling me that in tow months time he will have my appeal withdrawn. Or Im going to have to pay 12, 000 for transcripts.which I will refuse to spend any more momney unless I have a solicitor to help me. Sincerely; Richard Harris _________________________________________________________________ Scan and
Friday, December 22, 2006
Expropriation collations Fair land Law
- start collations
Talking about collationsCoalition“Now I am deciding that people who are expropriated or appealing to the government on any matters.....I want to start a coalition to bring all of us people together,” Harris says. “The coalition is for anyone in Canada who has been expropriated or has dealings with the government which they feel is not fair....I would like to organize it into a non-profit corporation so we can actually fight for our rightsWithoutout losing what we’ve got left.” Despite the insistence of family, friends and co-workers Harris will not let this matter go and just start a new life. He has suffered through a divorce, 2 heart attacks and he now lives day to day driving a taxi, all the while thinking and speaking obsessively about what the expropriation act has done to him. ““It has caused me a complete ruination of my whole family, my credit and my health,” Harris says. “My penalty here is loss of a whole life’s worth. I feel sorry for government employee’s that has got to go to court and lie on the stands where they ought to know that they can ruin somebody’s life. They should have let me move on with my life instead of seizing me up. I figured that these people are deliberately doing this.” If you would be interested in joining Rick Harris’s coalition to help stop expropriation injustice or would like more information on his cause, email http://injustcoalition.spaces.l/Coalition“Now I am deciding that people who are expropriated or appealing to the government on any matters.....I want to start a coalition to bring all of us people together,” Harris says. “The coalition is for anyone in Canada who has been expropriated or has dealings with the government which they feel is not fair....I would like to organize it into a non-profit corporation so we can actually fight Without rights...without losing what we’ve got left.” Despite the insistence of family, friends and co-workers Harris will not let this matter go and just start a new life. He has suffered through a divorce, 2 heart attacks and he now lives day to day driving a taxi, all the while thinking and speaking obsessively about what the expropriation act has done to him. ““It has caused me a complete ruination of my whole family, my credit and my health,” Harris says. “My penalty here is loss of a whole life’s worth. I feel sorry for government employee’s that has got to go to court and lie on the stands where they ought to know that they can ruin somebody’s life. They should have let me move on with my life instead of seizing me up. I figured that these people are deliberately doing this.” If you would be interested in joining Rick Harris’s coalition to help stop expropriation injustice or would like more information on his cblockering about visit with Blogger Charles LeBlanc nov.14-2006now i amQuote “Now I am deciding that people who are expropriated or appealing to the government on any matters.....I want to start a coalition to bring all of us people together,” Harris says. “The coalition is for anyone in Canada who has been expropriated or has dealings with the government which they feel is not fair....I would like to organize it into a non-profit corporation so we can actually fight for our rights...without losing what we’ve got left.” Despite the insistence of family, friends and co-workers Harris will not let this matter go and just start a new life. He has suffered through a divorce, 2 heart attacks and he now lives day to day driving a taxi, all the while thinking and speaking obsessively about what the expropriation act has done to him. ““It has caused me a complete ruination of my whole family, my credit and my health,” Harris says. “My penalty here is loss of a whole life’s worth. I feel sorry for government employee’s that has got to go to court and lie on the stands where they ought to know that they can ruin somebody’s life. They should have let me move on with my life instead of seizing me up. I figured that these people are deliberately doing this.” If you would be interested in joining Rick Harris’s coalition to help stop expropriation injustice or would like moreNovember14/06
# posted by Richard A. Harris @ 10:38 AM 0 comments
Thursday, December 21, 2006
need a LAWYER
Dear Lawyer
Here is a letter from Hugh J. Cameron RE (W. H. Goodwin & Co. Ltd., et al. ats. H.A.R. Construction Limited, et al. Court file# F/C/187/04) dated August 3, 2006 where Mr. Cameron is asking me to put in an amended Notice of Action with Statement of Claim attached to May 12, 2006. The only reason that I am doing this is for what went on in court, my original statement of claim there were mistakes in it. The first mistake was that I thought I received an intent to survey letter on December 20, 1996. By me going to get evidence that was only partially entered into court by Mr. Caldwell, I know now. (See evidence) I think by the new information I have that there should be further more amendments to this statement of claim as what went on at trial, them asking me to put a settlement offer to the respondent on March 8, 2005 (see copy of this letter). I believe this document was created because Judge Russell made a statement in court that the government did not have real appraisal reports. (See email with audio file) The facts are that these reports were submitted by the applicant instead of the respondent, why would this be? This settlement letter that my lawyers at trial talked me into signing only asking for my $21,000 back from the Goodwin matter, as you can see. Does this mean that I only can sew Goodwin for $21,000? Or can I sew him for my total life’s hold-up and damages from my whole life’s work? Which is now gone and the cost of being delayed from July 6, 1999 and right until the present time. There are also costs of all the running Mr. Goodwin had me doing from November 1998 until I received his draft report with a $70,000 plus bill. (See attachment) I have been told by several different lawyers that this is all that I would receive from Mr. Goodwin insurance company due to the circumstances that went on in court (file F/C/328/00). I would like for you to take a look at Examination for Discovery Volume II, September 11 and 12, 2001 and you can see that my lawyers were telling the government back then that I would be reimbursed for the Goodwin costs. This was not so. The lawyers went and put into the government a bill of their costs and totally left out my costs. They have been telling me since 2005 that they needed to keep my documents and receipts so they could put money in for my costs and they have still refused to give back my documentation to me. (See letter wrote and registered to them PP)
Getting back to this settlement document, which was created in court, I feel that I was the only one who had an appraisal report with the Babineau report. I should have been paid at least $165,000 for my losses which I was not. Not only time wasted here, but the cost of living everyday and not being able to move on with my life. The only reason I feel low balled because I was misrepresented and Judge Russell knew that I wouldn’t be able to afford to fight Mr. Goodwin. A lawyer already told me that the Goodwin matter is already cut and dry and I am just wasting my time. There was a conflict of interest of the Carter reports also he works for my own lawyers. I believe the best evidence should come into play with how many lots were left after the taking. (See attachment letter February 9, 2006 to Cameron) I believe this is an excuse for the lawyers to get off the conflict of interest when it comes to the applicant and going to the Law Society. I have also been told by another lawyer, that I should submit a bill of my costs to Mr. Eidt’s government solicitor to be heard in court. The facts are that Mr. Carter put my property in future residential development and he knew or should have known that the gravel pit and some of the equipment was sold in September 1997. The damages and costs losses started February 12, 1997 to the present day. There was also damage and costs incurred from March 1996. As you know I spent money on equipment repairs because my planning stage from March 1996 to be able to build houses for myself and sell. On or about April 7, 2000, Mr. Goodwin made up a second contract and would not tell us about the mistakes in his first draft report unless I signed the second contract and guaranteeing him $70,000 plus. On or about April 4, 2000, Mr. Raymond made me an offer of approximately $71,800 for the total property and also I would have to give him the only copy of Goodwin’s draft report, which is completely full of errors with misleading information in it. (Background report supplied to lawyers in February 2005) I think this Goodwin background report goes along with Mr. Carter’s theory, not to do a subdivision approach to value. Judge Russell in court should have had asked Mr. Carter when he was testifying that he turned in a report on January 23, 1998, as I see the government didn’t like this report and they sent him out to do 3 more reports, the same reports that showed up in the applicants documents in court. After this meeting on March 15, 2000 with Mr. Raymond, they already knew that Goodwin had me on a Mexican standoff, my lawyers weren’t doing anything to change this standoff and they decided to use Mr. Carter’s file notes instead of the 3 appraisal reports that would take place in court in 2005. Doesn’t Judge Russell have to make a decision on a report or does he make decisions on lies. You can see why this was done after the meeting of March 15, 2000. (After discovery of September 2001, they give me Mr. Carter’s file notes to critique. There were 30 pages of documentation given to both lawyers before the last discovery about Mr. Carter’s files and what he was up to.) See some attachments You can see Mr. Goodwin and my lawyers have me seized on or about February 2000 when Mr. Tucker arranged this meeting with the government. One page of these documents that we supplied at the meeting showed up in court as an exhibit. (See the total document and the one page exhibit out of it that showed up in court from the respondents)
I see now that Mr. Tucker has been a busy body and I believe that he really started working for Mr. Goodwin and Mr. Caldwell after the February 1st 2000 meeting in Moncton. I see now that he was trying to arrange this meeting with the government in January 2000. (See email) The fact is Mr. Tucker got a big raise in his disability package from being in the army in 2001. I think this might have something to do with him doing what he was doing for me. Mr. Tucker also works for Jody Carr, MLA, on his campaign.
It’s not like Jody Carr doesn’t know about my case. You should see all the documentation Mr. Tucker was sending to my lawyers. A document (dated November 25, 2002 emailed to Mr. Caldwell) Mr. Tucker sent to my lawyers, showed up in the court case (which was suppose to be confidential). Would Mr. Tucker be liable for some of these damages?
The biggest fact in this expropriation case was the way they took the property. The highest and best use for H.A.R.’s property would be 16 building lots in a subdivision loop with future access to other properties. I could have amended 1 lot at a time as I went along. Not just pay me for what suites their needs and the other conflicts of interests that were going on. It looks to me, reference to the McLeod case (14 page attachment) that the same people were involved in my case. It looks like to me where I am, there is no justice for a man’s whole life’s work, when I am still being deliberately delayed because under the court rules, I am not allowed to represent my own company (if this is so I am more likely to waste my time amending Notice of Action with Statement of Claim on the Goodwin matter). I was forced, from the advice of Mr. Caldwell, to reregister my company in 1998, around the same time he was writing Mr. Goodwin letters. I have never seen copies of these letters until later on in 2000. As you can see I was led to Mr. Goodwin by Mr. Caldwell. Mr. Goodwin was only hired on after I had a meeting with the government and quit my job working with Atcon (October 27, 1998, see email) because they broke the agreement with me because of trespassing and breech of my job title. This is the second job I lost with this land. How will I get receipts and files back from these lawyers? I feel I cannot put a complaint against the lawyers to the Law Society until I have these FILES and documents back because I fell they will make up internal memos and say they are in the file. Just like one that was made up like Heather Pugh’s which showed up as an exhibit in court. My own Lawyers was the ones to enter the exhibit with out my knowledge in court .you can see by the particular and Background report I did that there was no meeting on Dec.17 -1996 .(Whatever complaint I put into the Law Society, they would be able to cover their tracks and by keep my documents) I am not going to spend $12,000 worth of transcripts for the appeal because I feel the whole trial was staged, to let Mr. Goodwin get away for more or less stealing my life work and money. I believe the government knows exactly what is going on. This lawyer from Nova Scotia is made out to be an expert in expropriation cases is nothing but a front. I believe the government knew what I would take in February 1998 (See attachments) see Exhibit 14 from Discovery 2001 where Minister Sheldon Lee knew these lawyers were hooked up with Doug Young and MRDC. He could have let me move on down the road in February 19, 1998 without costing all this money to myself and the tax payers. (Lee knew I just sold my gravel pit and the property was no longer a future for myself. Look at the letters that Mr. Raymond is sending to the Law Society, (attachments) does he do this in every case that Mr. Caldwell has in New Brunswick? Under the Right Information Act, I would like to know this. I believe this highway project was another government run scandal. Mr. Raymond knew or should have known that Caldwell worked on the McLeod case started in 1993 and if he is allowed to work on the Mcleod case why would he be not allowed to work on my case. (I was told Mr. Caldwell had 18 cases when I hired him in December 1997.) Are the taxpayers deliberately paying Mr. Raymond to completely ruin my life. Also, after the discovery of 2001, I learned the government had paid a Fredericton appraisal firm over $10,000 for reports that are completely ridiculous. (Look at what took place at discovery in 2001, the lawyers said I was responsible for their bills in the discovery. If I was, then they should have not given me my money in November 2005.) If this wasn’t deliberately done, tell me why Mr. Raymond or Mr. Leblanc were offering me $31,000 before Carter did his reports and only sent me a statutory offer after the reports were done and only paying me $20,726. I have never accepted the cheque for the company’s property (see attachment) (Judge Russell is still paying me the same amount, see Judge Russell’s decision)
Mr. Goodwin has already received $21,000 for misleading draft report which I still don’t know to this day what criteria it’s in. I don’t think it’s a sub division approach like the Babineau report that we used in court before and after approach to value. It is no wheres similar to Mr. Babineau’s report (subdivision approach). This is the only way I can see where you can put market value on the lots. There would be no land developer cutting a pie shaped piece off the property and selling it for $2,700. Would this be the highest and best use? The taking of the property from Mr. Goodwin is $5,750, but he wanted me to guarantee him $70,000 (see attachment page 13 also attached is Mr. Goodwin’s statement). The extra money that I was paid in court looks awfully similar of what Mr. Goodwin has on page 13 of his report (see attachment). If you can look at the files my lawyers have, you can see they and DOT employees made Judge Russell’s decision for him back in 1998 around August because there are letters I have seen that Mr. Caldwell sent an internal memo to John Logan in Saint John and to Mr. Daley (who is only a CRA and wouldn’t be able to do an appraisal report for me anyway). Is there any chance that I could start a brand new federal court case against the Province of NB, Appraisal Association, the Ombudsman office, MRDC, and Paterson Palmer and all the appraisers involved? I feel there is no sense for me to go through an appeal, especially when the whole deck looks like it was stacked from the beginning and also if this could be done, I would sooner go this route, but I also think you should be able to squeeze $165,000 from the Goodwin insurance company and let me get on with my life. Look at what John Logan said my claims were worth on October 16, 2000. (See attachment) This attachment was also sent to Minister Brad Green. (fax proof ) Logan must know what he’s talking about because the government hired him. (Do you see where you might be able to get $165,000 for me from Goodwin’s insurance company with help from the justice department) Or tell me how much it would cost to amend my statement of claim so I can carry on and get my life’s net worth back. Is there any chance that I can get the appeal court to throw away the decision of Judge Russell because it is not based on the law. I would think he would have to go by the appraisal report and not hear say. (Highest and best use) Can I bring a law suit and claim against Mr. Raymond and Heather Pugh for deliberately lying in court? Mr. Raymond testified in court that he seen a blacked out copy of Mr. Goodwin’s report on April 4, 2000 which is a total lie. (See April 4, 2000 letter where Mr. Raymond offered me $71,800) What relevance did this have in the case if I wasn’t using Mr. Goodwin. Remember my lawyers were the ones who put this internal memo of Heather Pugh’s in court. If I didn’t know what plan 82 was until March 2005, how would Mr. Goodwin know about plan 82 in his report that I received July 1999. (If you look at page 90 of this report, see attachment) Look at the discovery of 2001 and the government list of documents, you can see it was set up from the beginning. I will send you the evidence used in court and Mr. Caldwell didn’t do anything about it. Remember I have over 300 pictures from the start of all of this. One exhibit that was entered in court, by the respondent is one page out of a document that Rex Tucker sent to John Logan confidentially when we were critiquing Mr. Goodwin’s draft appraisal report and finding the errors and looking at the logic for such a bad report. This document that Mr. Tucker made over is similar to the same document that I sent to John Logan after I retrieved all the quotes, the same ones that Mr. Goodwin had. When I looked at the theory of Goodwin’s report in 1999, it only worked out to $13,000 per house and lot. Rex Tucker upgraded it in January February or March of 2000 and sent it to my lawyers confidentially, which ended up as an exhibit in court. (See exhibit)
What I need from you
· Bring a motion, so I can represent myself and company on the Goodwin matter and also on the appeal matter.
· Put a bill of my costs under the Expropriation Act, so it can be taxed. As well what the lawyers put in.
· How am I going to get my files back from Paterson Palmer so I can continue on, do I go to the Law Society now?
· Will you help me amend my statement of claim to Hugh Cameron so he won’t have my case withdrawn
Please call me right away!
Thank You,
Re: W.H. Goodwin & Co. Ltd., et al. ats. H.A.R. Construction Limited, et al. Court File No. F/C/187/04I am still trying to retain a lawyer and I believe with advice from a different lawyer that I should be making further amendments to the Notice of Action With Statement of Claim.In reference to Goodwin’s response to the NB Association of Real Estate Appraisers at 403 Regent Street, Attn: Susan MacKenzie, on page 7, at the meeting of February 1, 2000, WHG agreed to produce the Complete Appraisal in the Self Contained Format. This is not the type of appraisal he told me he would be doing for me on November 17, 1998. He said he would be doing a sub-division approach to value. Here are 3 pages from Mr. Babineau’s report with 6 different methods of evaluation/ vacant land. The biggest thing about Goodwin’s draft report was that I didn’t understand what method he was using, it seemed to have several methods used in his report. If you don’t understand a report, you shouldn’t have to use it. At the start of Mr. Goodwin’s report, November 17, 1998, Mr. Goodwin gave me instructions to get him different quotations from other contractors and myself. He also told me he would be using me to build the streets as a contractor in a before and after scenario. On or about February 2, 1999, I sent a list of 4 or 5 pages of quotes and price to contract everything out. I saw the lot to be worth $20,796 for a bare lot in my location of my property. I had 2 survey lots and 16 more potential lots for a total of 18 lots, in the bank already paid for to start building houses until February 12, 1997, it became obvious that I would be expropriated. I know now that there is a conflict of interest between my lawyer, Mr. Caldwell, and Mr. Carter. The appraisal board would not send me a copy of Goodwin’s defense of June 11, 2004, until January 25, 2005.You know by now I have in my possession the second draft of Mr. Goodwin’s which I received March 3, 2005, that says now the value of the second report is worth $470,000. This is why I fell I am going to have to make more amendments to my Statement of Claim and Action. It is ludicrous, that Mr. Babineau did a report that we used in court and only charged me $7,000 compared to Mr. Goodwin who all I ready paid $21,000 and want me toguarantee him $70,000 plus. If you take a look at the decision that came down June 3, 2005 of Judge Russell, how much money I have already paid out in appraisal fees and all the hold up that was caused by the government, the appraisal board and my own lawyers, it looks like I bought this land so others could make money off it. I am waiting to see how much money I will receive back on the taxing of the lawyers bill which has not went to court yet, as far as I know. I also don’t know what Judge Russell’s decision was made on because it wasn’t made on Mr. Babineau’s report and I don’t think it was made on the three reports the government had. When I find this information out, I will be getting back to you. This is why I am seeking a lawyer’s assistance. The lawyers I have talked to, seem to tell me I am just wasting my time. I am also seeking my files back from my lawyers, which they refuse to give me.
Here is a letter from Hugh J. Cameron RE (W. H. Goodwin & Co. Ltd., et al. ats. H.A.R. Construction Limited, et al. Court file# F/C/187/04) dated August 3, 2006 where Mr. Cameron is asking me to put in an amended Notice of Action with Statement of Claim attached to May 12, 2006. The only reason that I am doing this is for what went on in court, my original statement of claim there were mistakes in it. The first mistake was that I thought I received an intent to survey letter on December 20, 1996. By me going to get evidence that was only partially entered into court by Mr. Caldwell, I know now. (See evidence) I think by the new information I have that there should be further more amendments to this statement of claim as what went on at trial, them asking me to put a settlement offer to the respondent on March 8, 2005 (see copy of this letter). I believe this document was created because Judge Russell made a statement in court that the government did not have real appraisal reports. (See email with audio file) The facts are that these reports were submitted by the applicant instead of the respondent, why would this be? This settlement letter that my lawyers at trial talked me into signing only asking for my $21,000 back from the Goodwin matter, as you can see. Does this mean that I only can sew Goodwin for $21,000? Or can I sew him for my total life’s hold-up and damages from my whole life’s work? Which is now gone and the cost of being delayed from July 6, 1999 and right until the present time. There are also costs of all the running Mr. Goodwin had me doing from November 1998 until I received his draft report with a $70,000 plus bill. (See attachment) I have been told by several different lawyers that this is all that I would receive from Mr. Goodwin insurance company due to the circumstances that went on in court (file F/C/328/00). I would like for you to take a look at Examination for Discovery Volume II, September 11 and 12, 2001 and you can see that my lawyers were telling the government back then that I would be reimbursed for the Goodwin costs. This was not so. The lawyers went and put into the government a bill of their costs and totally left out my costs. They have been telling me since 2005 that they needed to keep my documents and receipts so they could put money in for my costs and they have still refused to give back my documentation to me. (See letter wrote and registered to them PP)
Getting back to this settlement document, which was created in court, I feel that I was the only one who had an appraisal report with the Babineau report. I should have been paid at least $165,000 for my losses which I was not. Not only time wasted here, but the cost of living everyday and not being able to move on with my life. The only reason I feel low balled because I was misrepresented and Judge Russell knew that I wouldn’t be able to afford to fight Mr. Goodwin. A lawyer already told me that the Goodwin matter is already cut and dry and I am just wasting my time. There was a conflict of interest of the Carter reports also he works for my own lawyers. I believe the best evidence should come into play with how many lots were left after the taking. (See attachment letter February 9, 2006 to Cameron) I believe this is an excuse for the lawyers to get off the conflict of interest when it comes to the applicant and going to the Law Society. I have also been told by another lawyer, that I should submit a bill of my costs to Mr. Eidt’s government solicitor to be heard in court. The facts are that Mr. Carter put my property in future residential development and he knew or should have known that the gravel pit and some of the equipment was sold in September 1997. The damages and costs losses started February 12, 1997 to the present day. There was also damage and costs incurred from March 1996. As you know I spent money on equipment repairs because my planning stage from March 1996 to be able to build houses for myself and sell. On or about April 7, 2000, Mr. Goodwin made up a second contract and would not tell us about the mistakes in his first draft report unless I signed the second contract and guaranteeing him $70,000 plus. On or about April 4, 2000, Mr. Raymond made me an offer of approximately $71,800 for the total property and also I would have to give him the only copy of Goodwin’s draft report, which is completely full of errors with misleading information in it. (Background report supplied to lawyers in February 2005) I think this Goodwin background report goes along with Mr. Carter’s theory, not to do a subdivision approach to value. Judge Russell in court should have had asked Mr. Carter when he was testifying that he turned in a report on January 23, 1998, as I see the government didn’t like this report and they sent him out to do 3 more reports, the same reports that showed up in the applicants documents in court. After this meeting on March 15, 2000 with Mr. Raymond, they already knew that Goodwin had me on a Mexican standoff, my lawyers weren’t doing anything to change this standoff and they decided to use Mr. Carter’s file notes instead of the 3 appraisal reports that would take place in court in 2005. Doesn’t Judge Russell have to make a decision on a report or does he make decisions on lies. You can see why this was done after the meeting of March 15, 2000. (After discovery of September 2001, they give me Mr. Carter’s file notes to critique. There were 30 pages of documentation given to both lawyers before the last discovery about Mr. Carter’s files and what he was up to.) See some attachments You can see Mr. Goodwin and my lawyers have me seized on or about February 2000 when Mr. Tucker arranged this meeting with the government. One page of these documents that we supplied at the meeting showed up in court as an exhibit. (See the total document and the one page exhibit out of it that showed up in court from the respondents)
I see now that Mr. Tucker has been a busy body and I believe that he really started working for Mr. Goodwin and Mr. Caldwell after the February 1st 2000 meeting in Moncton. I see now that he was trying to arrange this meeting with the government in January 2000. (See email) The fact is Mr. Tucker got a big raise in his disability package from being in the army in 2001. I think this might have something to do with him doing what he was doing for me. Mr. Tucker also works for Jody Carr, MLA, on his campaign.
It’s not like Jody Carr doesn’t know about my case. You should see all the documentation Mr. Tucker was sending to my lawyers. A document (dated November 25, 2002 emailed to Mr. Caldwell) Mr. Tucker sent to my lawyers, showed up in the court case (which was suppose to be confidential). Would Mr. Tucker be liable for some of these damages?
The biggest fact in this expropriation case was the way they took the property. The highest and best use for H.A.R.’s property would be 16 building lots in a subdivision loop with future access to other properties. I could have amended 1 lot at a time as I went along. Not just pay me for what suites their needs and the other conflicts of interests that were going on. It looks to me, reference to the McLeod case (14 page attachment) that the same people were involved in my case. It looks like to me where I am, there is no justice for a man’s whole life’s work, when I am still being deliberately delayed because under the court rules, I am not allowed to represent my own company (if this is so I am more likely to waste my time amending Notice of Action with Statement of Claim on the Goodwin matter). I was forced, from the advice of Mr. Caldwell, to reregister my company in 1998, around the same time he was writing Mr. Goodwin letters. I have never seen copies of these letters until later on in 2000. As you can see I was led to Mr. Goodwin by Mr. Caldwell. Mr. Goodwin was only hired on after I had a meeting with the government and quit my job working with Atcon (October 27, 1998, see email) because they broke the agreement with me because of trespassing and breech of my job title. This is the second job I lost with this land. How will I get receipts and files back from these lawyers? I feel I cannot put a complaint against the lawyers to the Law Society until I have these FILES and documents back because I fell they will make up internal memos and say they are in the file. Just like one that was made up like Heather Pugh’s which showed up as an exhibit in court. My own Lawyers was the ones to enter the exhibit with out my knowledge in court .you can see by the particular and Background report I did that there was no meeting on Dec.17 -1996 .(Whatever complaint I put into the Law Society, they would be able to cover their tracks and by keep my documents) I am not going to spend $12,000 worth of transcripts for the appeal because I feel the whole trial was staged, to let Mr. Goodwin get away for more or less stealing my life work and money. I believe the government knows exactly what is going on. This lawyer from Nova Scotia is made out to be an expert in expropriation cases is nothing but a front. I believe the government knew what I would take in February 1998 (See attachments) see Exhibit 14 from Discovery 2001 where Minister Sheldon Lee knew these lawyers were hooked up with Doug Young and MRDC. He could have let me move on down the road in February 19, 1998 without costing all this money to myself and the tax payers. (Lee knew I just sold my gravel pit and the property was no longer a future for myself. Look at the letters that Mr. Raymond is sending to the Law Society, (attachments) does he do this in every case that Mr. Caldwell has in New Brunswick? Under the Right Information Act, I would like to know this. I believe this highway project was another government run scandal. Mr. Raymond knew or should have known that Caldwell worked on the McLeod case started in 1993 and if he is allowed to work on the Mcleod case why would he be not allowed to work on my case. (I was told Mr. Caldwell had 18 cases when I hired him in December 1997.) Are the taxpayers deliberately paying Mr. Raymond to completely ruin my life. Also, after the discovery of 2001, I learned the government had paid a Fredericton appraisal firm over $10,000 for reports that are completely ridiculous. (Look at what took place at discovery in 2001, the lawyers said I was responsible for their bills in the discovery. If I was, then they should have not given me my money in November 2005.) If this wasn’t deliberately done, tell me why Mr. Raymond or Mr. Leblanc were offering me $31,000 before Carter did his reports and only sent me a statutory offer after the reports were done and only paying me $20,726. I have never accepted the cheque for the company’s property (see attachment) (Judge Russell is still paying me the same amount, see Judge Russell’s decision)
Mr. Goodwin has already received $21,000 for misleading draft report which I still don’t know to this day what criteria it’s in. I don’t think it’s a sub division approach like the Babineau report that we used in court before and after approach to value. It is no wheres similar to Mr. Babineau’s report (subdivision approach). This is the only way I can see where you can put market value on the lots. There would be no land developer cutting a pie shaped piece off the property and selling it for $2,700. Would this be the highest and best use? The taking of the property from Mr. Goodwin is $5,750, but he wanted me to guarantee him $70,000 (see attachment page 13 also attached is Mr. Goodwin’s statement). The extra money that I was paid in court looks awfully similar of what Mr. Goodwin has on page 13 of his report (see attachment). If you can look at the files my lawyers have, you can see they and DOT employees made Judge Russell’s decision for him back in 1998 around August because there are letters I have seen that Mr. Caldwell sent an internal memo to John Logan in Saint John and to Mr. Daley (who is only a CRA and wouldn’t be able to do an appraisal report for me anyway). Is there any chance that I could start a brand new federal court case against the Province of NB, Appraisal Association, the Ombudsman office, MRDC, and Paterson Palmer and all the appraisers involved? I feel there is no sense for me to go through an appeal, especially when the whole deck looks like it was stacked from the beginning and also if this could be done, I would sooner go this route, but I also think you should be able to squeeze $165,000 from the Goodwin insurance company and let me get on with my life. Look at what John Logan said my claims were worth on October 16, 2000. (See attachment) This attachment was also sent to Minister Brad Green. (fax proof ) Logan must know what he’s talking about because the government hired him. (Do you see where you might be able to get $165,000 for me from Goodwin’s insurance company with help from the justice department) Or tell me how much it would cost to amend my statement of claim so I can carry on and get my life’s net worth back. Is there any chance that I can get the appeal court to throw away the decision of Judge Russell because it is not based on the law. I would think he would have to go by the appraisal report and not hear say. (Highest and best use) Can I bring a law suit and claim against Mr. Raymond and Heather Pugh for deliberately lying in court? Mr. Raymond testified in court that he seen a blacked out copy of Mr. Goodwin’s report on April 4, 2000 which is a total lie. (See April 4, 2000 letter where Mr. Raymond offered me $71,800) What relevance did this have in the case if I wasn’t using Mr. Goodwin. Remember my lawyers were the ones who put this internal memo of Heather Pugh’s in court. If I didn’t know what plan 82 was until March 2005, how would Mr. Goodwin know about plan 82 in his report that I received July 1999. (If you look at page 90 of this report, see attachment) Look at the discovery of 2001 and the government list of documents, you can see it was set up from the beginning. I will send you the evidence used in court and Mr. Caldwell didn’t do anything about it. Remember I have over 300 pictures from the start of all of this. One exhibit that was entered in court, by the respondent is one page out of a document that Rex Tucker sent to John Logan confidentially when we were critiquing Mr. Goodwin’s draft appraisal report and finding the errors and looking at the logic for such a bad report. This document that Mr. Tucker made over is similar to the same document that I sent to John Logan after I retrieved all the quotes, the same ones that Mr. Goodwin had. When I looked at the theory of Goodwin’s report in 1999, it only worked out to $13,000 per house and lot. Rex Tucker upgraded it in January February or March of 2000 and sent it to my lawyers confidentially, which ended up as an exhibit in court. (See exhibit)
What I need from you
· Bring a motion, so I can represent myself and company on the Goodwin matter and also on the appeal matter.
· Put a bill of my costs under the Expropriation Act, so it can be taxed. As well what the lawyers put in.
· How am I going to get my files back from Paterson Palmer so I can continue on, do I go to the Law Society now?
· Will you help me amend my statement of claim to Hugh Cameron so he won’t have my case withdrawn
Please call me right away!
Thank You,
Re: W.H. Goodwin & Co. Ltd., et al. ats. H.A.R. Construction Limited, et al. Court File No. F/C/187/04I am still trying to retain a lawyer and I believe with advice from a different lawyer that I should be making further amendments to the Notice of Action With Statement of Claim.In reference to Goodwin’s response to the NB Association of Real Estate Appraisers at 403 Regent Street, Attn: Susan MacKenzie, on page 7, at the meeting of February 1, 2000, WHG agreed to produce the Complete Appraisal in the Self Contained Format. This is not the type of appraisal he told me he would be doing for me on November 17, 1998. He said he would be doing a sub-division approach to value. Here are 3 pages from Mr. Babineau’s report with 6 different methods of evaluation/ vacant land. The biggest thing about Goodwin’s draft report was that I didn’t understand what method he was using, it seemed to have several methods used in his report. If you don’t understand a report, you shouldn’t have to use it. At the start of Mr. Goodwin’s report, November 17, 1998, Mr. Goodwin gave me instructions to get him different quotations from other contractors and myself. He also told me he would be using me to build the streets as a contractor in a before and after scenario. On or about February 2, 1999, I sent a list of 4 or 5 pages of quotes and price to contract everything out. I saw the lot to be worth $20,796 for a bare lot in my location of my property. I had 2 survey lots and 16 more potential lots for a total of 18 lots, in the bank already paid for to start building houses until February 12, 1997, it became obvious that I would be expropriated. I know now that there is a conflict of interest between my lawyer, Mr. Caldwell, and Mr. Carter. The appraisal board would not send me a copy of Goodwin’s defense of June 11, 2004, until January 25, 2005.You know by now I have in my possession the second draft of Mr. Goodwin’s which I received March 3, 2005, that says now the value of the second report is worth $470,000. This is why I fell I am going to have to make more amendments to my Statement of Claim and Action. It is ludicrous, that Mr. Babineau did a report that we used in court and only charged me $7,000 compared to Mr. Goodwin who all I ready paid $21,000 and want me toguarantee him $70,000 plus. If you take a look at the decision that came down June 3, 2005 of Judge Russell, how much money I have already paid out in appraisal fees and all the hold up that was caused by the government, the appraisal board and my own lawyers, it looks like I bought this land so others could make money off it. I am waiting to see how much money I will receive back on the taxing of the lawyers bill which has not went to court yet, as far as I know. I also don’t know what Judge Russell’s decision was made on because it wasn’t made on Mr. Babineau’s report and I don’t think it was made on the three reports the government had. When I find this information out, I will be getting back to you. This is why I am seeking a lawyer’s assistance. The lawyers I have talked to, seem to tell me I am just wasting my time. I am also seeking my files back from my lawyers, which they refuse to give me.
Calling for help from Public
or letter Richard A Harris ,721 Irvine street, Apt.#40 Fredericton NB. E3A,3E8
Or call 506-260-7960 I need help to find these 4 pending Taxations victims as to this letter October 24,2006 ?
Four expropriated Cases of the NS lawyers getting sponsor by NB Tax payers to take people property away.
Not counting my COST from 1997 PATTERSON,PALMER , NS BILL=
$153,828.69 NB, Patterson,Palmer,=$42,921.42
Total of oustanding bill of there costs =$212,359.86
Now look at the McLeod Case of Cost of Taxations June 22,2000
Patterson,Palmer,Hunt,Murphy $201,228.01 W.H. Goodwin Account = $83,350.24 total =$333,333.01 ? Now look at Counsel on PPHM letter Head= Hon,M.Douglas Young . p.c.
Now is this left over Sponsorshit or Sponsorship, will Graham shake up the office of the Attorney General or will he pass the buck to Miles??
Question: when did the N.B.Government Knew what was to take place in almost all EXPROPRIATION Cases.??
The Second ISSUE Will I get to look at NS lawyer Robert Pineo AFFIDAVIT,? OR will it be like when I ask the Minister Denis Landry for Information about the 4 lane cordoor Survey work. when was it Done.? Was it before December 11,1996, or in March 1997.?When did they have plans to move the Alinement.?? did TRA Food Get wind of chang.
The third ISSUE will I be Allow to enter AFFIDAVIT with my Bill ? Like the one I had ready to enter At discovery 2004 , sign by Commissioner of Oaths on March 16,2004 but now I will need a up dated one as soon as I get my 10 bankers boxes of file back.????
Is there any one out there that would have time to help me on these Matters.
Calling for help from Public
or letter Richard A Harris ,721 Irvine street, Apt.#40 Fredericton NB. E3A,3E8
Or call 506-260-7960 I need help to find these 4 pending Taxations victims as to this letter October 24,2006 ?
Four expropriated Cases of the NS lawyers getting sponsor by NB Tax payers to take people property away.
Not counting my COST from 1997 PATTERSON,PALMER , NS BILL=
$153,828.69 NB, Patterson,Palmer,=$42,921.42
Total of oustanding bill of there costs =$212,359.86
Now look at the McLeod Case of Cost of Taxations June 22,2000
Patterson,Palmer,Hunt,Murphy $201,228.01 W.H. Goodwin Account = $83,350.24 total =$333,333.01 ? Now look at Counsel on PPHM letter Head= Hon,M.Douglas Young . p.c.
Now is this left over Sponsorshit or Sponsorship, will Graham shake up the office of the Attorney General or will he pass the buck to Miles??
Question: when did the N.B.Government Knew what was to take place in almost all EXPROPRIATION Cases.??
The Second ISSUE Will I get to look at NS lawyer Robert Pineo AFFIDAVIT,? OR will it be like when I ask the Minister Denis Landry for Information about the 4 lane cordoor Survey work. when was it Done.? Was it before December 11,1996, or in March 1997.?When did they have plans to move the Alinement.?? did TRA Food Get wind of chang.
The third ISSUE will I be Allow to enter AFFIDAVIT with my Bill ? Like the one I had ready to enter At discovery 2004 , sign by Commissioner of Oaths on March 16,2004 but now I will need a up dated one as soon as I get my 10 bankers boxes of file back.????
Is there any one out there that would have time to help me on these Matters.
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Richard Harris believes the Lord Government or bureaucrats treated him unfairly!!
IMG_4387 Originally uploaded by Oldmaison. From the story he’s saying? The Lord Government force him to accept a deal to sell his land at a lower price for a new Four Lane Highway. I don’t know the whole details so maybe Richard could write a few issues in this blog? Who knows? It was The Government in 1997 that started the war, This is what i had to work with 18-building lots befour february 12/1997
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Richard Harris believes the Lord Government or bureaucrats treated him unfairly!!
IMG_4387 Originally uploaded by Oldmaison. From the story he’s saying? The Lord Government force him to accept a deal to sell his land at a lower price for a new Four Lane Highway. I don’t know the whole details so maybe Richard could write a few issues in this blog? Who knows? It was The Government in 1997 that started the war, This is what i had to work with 18-building lots befour february 12/1997
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
what was the Cost to move the salt and sand storagebuilding ???
what do you think the cost would be to moved the the Salt, sand Storage Building ? what do you think the cost of my Court case,?? to the TAX PAYERS
Monday, December 18, 2006
What Rights do I have,To move on with Life After June 3 2005
OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON January 24 the ELIMINATION OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON JANUARY 24TH!!!http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ the fact is that I can"t move a way from New Brunswick unless I give up on these law suit RE:F/C/187/o4, The Court Of Appeal of NB. Re::File 100/05 ; Look at Letter of September 28/06 , Received and filed on September 29/2006 "Delivered by hand ATTENTION: MICHAEL BRAY,Q.C REGISTRAR. Sir, I am not a lawyer and do not Know what a status Report (form 62,J ) IS,however ,these are the facts of my CASE to the best of my ability:-(1)
(1) I have been requesting my Total Files back from my x lawyers (see Attached letter dated September 14,2006 to the NB Lawyer Jamie Eddy:,Esq. ] now look at Law Society.{blog ] (2) I do not Know What Judge Russell"s Desision was Based on, and i do not think it was based on any REPORTS of APPRAISERS, Such as Babineau's Report, The Rules of Best Evidence. [ Now look at his Exter Bill of Babineau Invoice #05054id,Date 04/21/2005 and when I recived a copy from my now X lawyers in the mail on May 8 2005, =Description of exter invoice ,Discovery -Undertakings 1 day,meeting with lawyers,review Report,Court Date, Expenses:Travel,Charts,Hotels (2) Meals, H-Hst 15% for a Total of 4,835.75 Now look at the Lawyers bill to New Brunswick TAX PAYERS? =Summary of Bill of COSTS. Legal Services . Patterson Palmer -Truro Office=$153,828.69 Fredericton Office=$42,921.42 For a Total outstanding bill of costs =$212,359.86 Now look at the McLeod court case Bill of Cost =$333,333.01 And who was the stage player in this Court Case,??????? I can't tell you any more now ,? because i got to go to Work at the new dead end job of the Government Propaganda Systens.of Deep pocketing Tacit,???? (2 ) I was advisised in early 2001 by LAWYER BOB that in order to take or start a ACTION against Mr. Goodwin ,that I would need an Appraisal Report used in the Expropriation case , (The file # F/C/328/oo ) this is one reason I Retained the Number two Appraiser Mr.Babineau [see attached faxed correspondence dated April 3,2001 ? whitch should have been in Mr. Babineau's file or notes ,and was not.] ?? Build lots worth 16, to 25,000.dollars each. (3). also is Attached is page 90 from the Goodwin's draft report.The third or forth paragraph down ,now EXPLAINS TO ME how this an independent appraiser would know what is being faxed by a Governments worker Ross Little .? ! I confirm I had no Knowledge of any of this until August,2001,two weeks before Discovery of September 11th and 12 th 2001. so, how did Mr.Goodwin of these incidents which were occurring at D.O.T. in 1999.????? On or About February 13.1997 ,I went to N.B. D.o.T.planning office with a drawing thatI received from the Development Officer ,Lonnie Forbes, a drawing dated 12/96 . I drew a red line on it indicated where DOT could have saved the salt and sand storage buildings, by taking all of total Property of mine,by doing this.? now if Mr. Forbes had Plan # 82 ? that Mr. Goodwin was aware of; he did not provide it to me. He did not even provide it with his letter to me dated February 5 ,1997 ,?Which was received in mail on or about February 13, 1997, now this was after Steven LeBlanc meeting with Marilyn Harris and Richard Harris on February 12,1997,[look at Discovery 2001 Exhibit 21, and then take a look at Heather Pugh nemo and what she seed in Court,?? Now look at Mr.Justice David H. Russell ,June 3,/05 Decision on paragraph [51] quote, I accept Ms.Pugh's Evidence as being factual. I conclude Mr Harris did meet with Heather Pugh on the date mentioned in the memo ,. now think about this my wife Marilyn did not get of work till 4.30 pm,on the December 17/96 and the :only Public Meeting of December 11;1996 that people did not know about,the drawing with a date of 12/96 .the one that Lonnie Forbes,sent me. Now look at Sheldon Lee letter of May,28/1997 that i will not know about tile September 2001 , this lead me,QUOTE I do not belive this plan # 82 was not even prepared until March ,1997 because the Road center line as indicated on plan #82 must have come of a another survey sketch and the survey work.? so why would they have the survey work done befour December 17,1996. (4) My appraiser ,Mr. Babineau ,used Chapter 14 of the Expropriation Act,(section 45,) where a Business is located on the land Exproprrated ,DISTURBANCE DAMAGE ,include DAMAGES .....(FACT Land that would make 18 lots in one located,) see Attached letter from Whitehead Bird & Miles Dated October 6,1997, to DOT. This letter was forwarded with out my Knowledge,? I had by this date. Already sold my Gravel pit ,.and the Land had no FUTURE development potential for me, Allen Miles Esq, was the Lawyer who arranged for the sale of my Gravel Pit. ??
(1) I have been requesting my Total Files back from my x lawyers (see Attached letter dated September 14,2006 to the NB Lawyer Jamie Eddy:,Esq. ] now look at Law Society.{blog ] (2) I do not Know What Judge Russell"s Desision was Based on, and i do not think it was based on any REPORTS of APPRAISERS, Such as Babineau's Report, The Rules of Best Evidence. [ Now look at his Exter Bill of Babineau Invoice #05054id,Date 04/21/2005 and when I recived a copy from my now X lawyers in the mail on May 8 2005, =Description of exter invoice ,Discovery -Undertakings 1 day,meeting with lawyers,review Report,Court Date, Expenses:Travel,Charts,Hotels (2) Meals, H-Hst 15% for a Total of 4,835.75 Now look at the Lawyers bill to New Brunswick TAX PAYERS? =Summary of Bill of COSTS. Legal Services . Patterson Palmer -Truro Office=$153,828.69 Fredericton Office=$42,921.42 For a Total outstanding bill of costs =$212,359.86 Now look at the McLeod court case Bill of Cost =$333,333.01 And who was the stage player in this Court Case,??????? I can't tell you any more now ,? because i got to go to Work at the new dead end job of the Government Propaganda Systens.of Deep pocketing Tacit,???? (2 ) I was advisised in early 2001 by LAWYER BOB that in order to take or start a ACTION against Mr. Goodwin ,that I would need an Appraisal Report used in the Expropriation case , (The file # F/C/328/oo ) this is one reason I Retained the Number two Appraiser Mr.Babineau [see attached faxed correspondence dated April 3,2001 ? whitch should have been in Mr. Babineau's file or notes ,and was not.] ?? Build lots worth 16, to 25,000.dollars each. (3). also is Attached is page 90 from the Goodwin's draft report.The third or forth paragraph down ,now EXPLAINS TO ME how this an independent appraiser would know what is being faxed by a Governments worker Ross Little .? ! I confirm I had no Knowledge of any of this until August,2001,two weeks before Discovery of September 11th and 12 th 2001. so, how did Mr.Goodwin of these incidents which were occurring at D.O.T. in 1999.????? On or About February 13.1997 ,I went to N.B. D.o.T.planning office with a drawing thatI received from the Development Officer ,Lonnie Forbes, a drawing dated 12/96 . I drew a red line on it indicated where DOT could have saved the salt and sand storage buildings, by taking all of total Property of mine,by doing this.? now if Mr. Forbes had Plan # 82 ? that Mr. Goodwin was aware of; he did not provide it to me. He did not even provide it with his letter to me dated February 5 ,1997 ,?Which was received in mail on or about February 13, 1997, now this was after Steven LeBlanc meeting with Marilyn Harris and Richard Harris on February 12,1997,[look at Discovery 2001 Exhibit 21, and then take a look at Heather Pugh nemo and what she seed in Court,?? Now look at Mr.Justice David H. Russell ,June 3,/05 Decision on paragraph [51] quote, I accept Ms.Pugh's Evidence as being factual. I conclude Mr Harris did meet with Heather Pugh on the date mentioned in the memo ,. now think about this my wife Marilyn did not get of work till 4.30 pm,on the December 17/96 and the :only Public Meeting of December 11;1996 that people did not know about,the drawing with a date of 12/96 .the one that Lonnie Forbes,sent me. Now look at Sheldon Lee letter of May,28/1997 that i will not know about tile September 2001 , this lead me,QUOTE I do not belive this plan # 82 was not even prepared until March ,1997 because the Road center line as indicated on plan #82 must have come of a another survey sketch and the survey work.? so why would they have the survey work done befour December 17,1996. (4) My appraiser ,Mr. Babineau ,used Chapter 14 of the Expropriation Act,(section 45,) where a Business is located on the land Exproprrated ,DISTURBANCE DAMAGE ,include DAMAGES .....(FACT Land that would make 18 lots in one located,) see Attached letter from Whitehead Bird & Miles Dated October 6,1997, to DOT. This letter was forwarded with out my Knowledge,? I had by this date. Already sold my Gravel pit ,.and the Land had no FUTURE development potential for me, Allen Miles Esq, was the Lawyer who arranged for the sale of my Gravel Pit. ??
ELIMINATION OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON January 24 the ELIMINATION OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON JANUARY 24TH!!!http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ The fact is that I can"t move a way from New Brunswick unless I give up on these law suit RE:F/C/187/of Court Of Appeal of NB. Re:: 100/05 ; Look at Letter of September 28/06 , Received and filed on September 29/2006 "Delivered by hand ATTENTION: MICHAEL BRAY,Q.C REGISTRAR. Sir, I am not a lawyer and do not Know what a status Report (form 62,J ) IS,however ,these are the facts of my CASE to the best of my BEST ability:
(1) I have been requesting my Total Files back from my x lawyers (see Attached letter dated September 14,2006 to the NB Lawyer Jaime Eddy:,Esq. ] now look at Law Society. = [blog ] (2) I do not Know What Judge Russell"s decision was Based on, and I do not think it was based on any REPORTS of APPRAISERS, Such as Babineau's Report, The Rules of Best Evidence. [ Now look at his extra Bill of Babineau Invoice #05054id,Date 04/21/2005 and when I received a copy from my now X lawyers in the mail on May 8 2005, =Description of extra invoice ,Discovery -Undertakings 1 day,meeting with lawyers,review Report,Court Date, Expenses:Travel,Charts,Hotels (2) Meals, H-Hst 15% for a Total of $4,835.75 Now look at the Lawyers bill to New Brunswick TAX PAYERS? =Summary of Bill of COSTS. Legal Services . Patterson Palmer -Truro Office=$153,828.69 Fredericton Office=$42,921.42 For a Total outstanding bill of costs =$212,359.86 Now look at the McLeod court case Bill of Cost =$333,333.01 And who was the stage player in this Court Case,??????? I can't tell you any more now , because I got to go to Work at the new dead end job of the Government Propaganda systems Deep pocketing Tacit,???? I was Advise in earl2001 by a lawyer that in order to take a Action against Appraisers Mr.Goodwin.=RE:Court File F/C/187/04 . That I would
(1) I have been requesting my Total Files back from my x lawyers (see Attached letter dated September 14,2006 to the NB Lawyer Jaime Eddy:,Esq. ] now look at Law Society. = [blog ] (2) I do not Know What Judge Russell"s decision was Based on, and I do not think it was based on any REPORTS of APPRAISERS, Such as Babineau's Report, The Rules of Best Evidence. [ Now look at his extra Bill of Babineau Invoice #05054id,Date 04/21/2005 and when I received a copy from my now X lawyers in the mail on May 8 2005, =Description of extra invoice ,Discovery -Undertakings 1 day,meeting with lawyers,review Report,Court Date, Expenses:Travel,Charts,Hotels (2) Meals, H-Hst 15% for a Total of $4,835.75 Now look at the Lawyers bill to New Brunswick TAX PAYERS? =Summary of Bill of COSTS. Legal Services . Patterson Palmer -Truro Office=$153,828.69 Fredericton Office=$42,921.42 For a Total outstanding bill of costs =$212,359.86 Now look at the McLeod court case Bill of Cost =$333,333.01 And who was the stage player in this Court Case,??????? I can't tell you any more now , because I got to go to Work at the new dead end job of the Government Propaganda systems Deep pocketing Tacit,???? I was Advise in earl2001 by a lawyer that in order to take a Action against Appraisers Mr.Goodwin.=RE:Court File F/C/187/04 . That I would
need a Lawyer for sure,???
d
Human Right commission ? What is it propaganda tacit
Charles leveling
Sent :
December 18, 2006 12:50:21 PM
To :
oldmaison@yahoo.com
Subject :
ELIMINATION OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON January 24 the
ELIMINATION OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON JANUARY 24TH!!!
http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ the fact is that i can"t move a way from New Brunswick umless i give up on these law suit RE:F/C/187/o4 Court Of Appeal of NB. Re:: 100/05 ; Look at Letter of September 28/06 , Received and filed on September 29/2006 "Delivered by hand ATTENTION: MICHAEL BRAY,Q.C REGISTRAR. Sir, I am not a lawyer and do not Know what a status Report (form 62,J ) IS,however ,these are the facts of my CASE to the best of my ability:-(1)- (1) I have been requesting my Total Files back from my x lawyers (see Attached letter dated September 14,2006 to the NB Lawyer Jamie Eddy:,Esq. ] now look at Law Society.
(2) I do not Know What Judge Russell"s Desision was Based on, and i do not think it was based on any REPORTS of APPRAISERS, Such as Babineau's Report, The Rules of Best Evidence. [ Now look at his Exter Bill of Babineau Invoice #05054id,Date 04/21/2005 and when I recived a copy from my now X lawyers in the mail on May 8 2005, =Description of exter invoice ,Discovery -Undertakings 1 day,meeting with lawyers,review Report,Court Date, Expenses:Travel,Charts,Hotels (2) Meals, H-Hst 15% for a Total of 4,835.75 Now look at the Lawyers bill to New Brunswick TAX PAYERS? =Summary of Bill of COSTS. Legal Services . Patterson Palmer -Truro Office=$153,828.69 Fredericton Office=$42,921.42 For a Total outstanding bill of costs =$212,359.86 Now look at the McLeod court case Bill of Cost =$333,333.01 And who was the stage player in this Court Case,??????? I can't tell you any more now , because i got to go to Work at the new dead end job of the Government Propaganda Systens.of Deep pocketing Tacit,????
Sunday, December 17, 2006
Friday, December 15, 2006
RE: Complaint Against Jamie C. Eddy,Lawyer
Please be advised that your requesting a copy of your FILE,again, I must note that the Law Society of New Brunswick does not have the Jurisdiction to obtain this file for you.??? your truly Shirley C MacLean ,Registrar of Complaints. ? c Personal & Confidential sponsorship, It should be Personal &confidential.? Maybe Mr.Justice John Gomery's Can do a report for Bernard Lord ? but i think he all ready got his set for life Ticket,??? I would sure like to step away from this legel fight .no matter if got a million Dollors,?? how do you give a man 20 year of life back.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
TEXTAREA_ID
